A Universally Defined Standard to Evaluate the Mechanical Stability of Microtextured Surfaces is Necessitated

Huichao Jin
{"title":"A Universally Defined Standard to Evaluate the Mechanical Stability of Microtextured Surfaces is Necessitated","authors":"Huichao Jin","doi":"10.31031/rdms.2020.14.000832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The poor mechanical stability of microtextured surfaces is a major barrier to their engineering applications [1,2]. Accordingly, researchers have devoted themselves to developing microtextured surfaces with robust mechanical stability. Recently, Wu et al. [3] reported a superhydrophobic coating with a robust hierarchical structure and compared its mechanical stability to that of the other robust surfaces. The authors claimed that the test conditions used to evaluate the mechanical properties were the most rigorous as compared to those used in previously reported tests. As there is no universal standard to quantify the mechanical stability of a surface, the following questions are worth discussing: “how was the comparison carried out?” and “what test conditions qualify as rigorous?” Currently, several methods have been widely used to evaluate the mechanical stability of microtextured surfaces, including sandpaper abrasion, blade scraping, finger wiping, tape peeling, and sand impact. After these tests are performed, researchers usually use the changes in the Water Contact Angle (WCA) to evaluate the mechanical stability of microtextured the specific testing are many and varied the parameters parameter easier practices it difficult to compare the mechanical property of a microtextured surface with other robust surfaces.","PeriodicalId":20943,"journal":{"name":"Research & Development in Material Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research & Development in Material Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/rdms.2020.14.000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The poor mechanical stability of microtextured surfaces is a major barrier to their engineering applications [1,2]. Accordingly, researchers have devoted themselves to developing microtextured surfaces with robust mechanical stability. Recently, Wu et al. [3] reported a superhydrophobic coating with a robust hierarchical structure and compared its mechanical stability to that of the other robust surfaces. The authors claimed that the test conditions used to evaluate the mechanical properties were the most rigorous as compared to those used in previously reported tests. As there is no universal standard to quantify the mechanical stability of a surface, the following questions are worth discussing: “how was the comparison carried out?” and “what test conditions qualify as rigorous?” Currently, several methods have been widely used to evaluate the mechanical stability of microtextured surfaces, including sandpaper abrasion, blade scraping, finger wiping, tape peeling, and sand impact. After these tests are performed, researchers usually use the changes in the Water Contact Angle (WCA) to evaluate the mechanical stability of microtextured the specific testing are many and varied the parameters parameter easier practices it difficult to compare the mechanical property of a microtextured surface with other robust surfaces.
需要一个统一的标准来评价微织构表面的机械稳定性
微织构表面机械稳定性差是其工程应用的主要障碍[1,2]。因此,研究人员致力于开发具有强大机械稳定性的微纹理表面。最近,Wu等人[3]报道了一种具有坚固分层结构的超疏水涂层,并将其与其他坚固表面的机械稳定性进行了比较。作者声称,与以前报告的试验相比,用于评估机械性能的试验条件是最严格的。由于没有统一的标准来量化表面的机械稳定性,以下问题值得讨论:“如何进行比较?”以及“什么样的测试条件符合严格标准?”目前,有几种方法被广泛用于评估微纹理表面的机械稳定性,包括砂纸磨损、刀片刮擦、手指擦拭、胶带剥落和砂冲击。在进行这些测试后,研究人员通常使用水接触角(WCA)的变化来评估微织构表面的力学稳定性,具体测试的参数很多,参数变化也比较容易,很难将微织构表面的力学性能与其他坚固表面进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信