La represión de las masas. La prensa y la securitización del disenso juvenil en España

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
J. García-García, Kerman Calvo Borobia
{"title":"La represión de las masas. La prensa y la securitización del disenso juvenil en España","authors":"J. García-García, Kerman Calvo Borobia","doi":"10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we analyse the discourse of conservative commentators and journalists who produced critical items against 15-M mobilisations between 16 May and 30 September 2011 in three newspapers: Abc, Libertad Digital and La Razon . The effort on the part of conservative journalists to deride and frame 15-M mobilisations as a threat should be considered repression; more precisely, these mechanisms should be seen as part of a broader strategy of repression of youth dissent, a strategy where conservative media outlets, through the securitisation of protesting, collaborate with conservative political parties, the police and some segments within the criminal legal system. The examination of the repressive behaviour of the Spanish media reveals a surprising parallelism between the present and a past that was thought to have been long overcome. In their fierce criticism of 15-M activism, Spanish conservative commentators have brought crowd psychology back to life – the popular theory that, until well into the twentieth century, summarized certain nineteenth-century intellectual and cultural elites’ fear of middle and working-class activism.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article we analyse the discourse of conservative commentators and journalists who produced critical items against 15-M mobilisations between 16 May and 30 September 2011 in three newspapers: Abc, Libertad Digital and La Razon . The effort on the part of conservative journalists to deride and frame 15-M mobilisations as a threat should be considered repression; more precisely, these mechanisms should be seen as part of a broader strategy of repression of youth dissent, a strategy where conservative media outlets, through the securitisation of protesting, collaborate with conservative political parties, the police and some segments within the criminal legal system. The examination of the repressive behaviour of the Spanish media reveals a surprising parallelism between the present and a past that was thought to have been long overcome. In their fierce criticism of 15-M activism, Spanish conservative commentators have brought crowd psychology back to life – the popular theory that, until well into the twentieth century, summarized certain nineteenth-century intellectual and cultural elites’ fear of middle and working-class activism.
对群众的镇压。西班牙的媒体和青年异议证券化
在本文中,我们分析了保守派评论员和记者的话语,他们在Abc、Libertad Digital和La Razon三家报纸上发表了反对2011年5月16日至9月30日1500万运动的批评文章。保守派记者嘲笑并将15-M运动定性为威胁的努力应被视为镇压;更准确地说,这些机制应被视为更广泛的压制青年异议战略的一部分,保守媒体通过抗议活动的证券化,与保守政党、警察和刑事司法系统内的一些部门合作。对西班牙媒体压制行为的研究揭示了现在和过去之间令人惊讶的相似之处,这种相似之处被认为早已被克服。在他们对15-M运动的激烈批评中,西班牙的保守派评论员把群众心理学带回到了生活中——这个流行的理论,直到20世纪,总结了某些19世纪知识分子和文化精英对中产阶级和工人阶级运动的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信