Meta-Analysis of P73 Polymorphism and Risk of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Xiangsong Cheng, Haiyang Liu, Yong-na Song, Yunxia An, Xuan Weixia, Z. Wang, Zhiwei Xu, Nan Wei, Xiaoju Zhang
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of P73 Polymorphism and Risk of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Xiangsong Cheng, Haiyang Liu, Yong-na Song, Yunxia An, Xuan Weixia, Z. Wang, Zhiwei Xu, Nan Wei, Xiaoju Zhang","doi":"10.4172/2161-105X.1000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The relationship between p73 gene G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and non-small cell lung cancer risk is unclear. Now we performed a meta-analysis to clarify the association of p73 polymorphism with nonsmall cell lung cancer.Methods: To assess the association between p73 polymorphism and non-small cell lung cancer deeply, we searched Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases. All analyses were done using RevMan 5.3 software which provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and Stata version 12.0. The statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the chi-square-based Q test. We used the random effects model as well as the fixed effects model to calculate the pooled ORs.Results: Our meta-analysis included 6 studies with a total of 1658 patients with non-small lung cancer and 2328 cancer-free control subjects. In all comparisons, we find none of genetic models shows significant relation with the risk of non-small lung cancer (recessive model: OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.43; dominant model: OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.37-1.06; co-dominant model: OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.94-2.83; allelic model: OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 0.98-1.48). However, when we proceeded to subgroup analysis according country, significantly increased risk was observed in a recessive models (OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15-1.59), in a co-dominant model: (OR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.76-3.53), in an allelic model (OR, 1.41, 95%CI, 1.24-1.61). Significantly decreased risk was observed in a dominant model (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.30-0.59).Conclusions: Our results indicate that p73 gene G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism is associated with the risk of non-small cell lung cancer in China. However, a large gene-to-environment research is required to confirm this conclusion.","PeriodicalId":90449,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-105X.1000446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The relationship between p73 gene G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and non-small cell lung cancer risk is unclear. Now we performed a meta-analysis to clarify the association of p73 polymorphism with nonsmall cell lung cancer.Methods: To assess the association between p73 polymorphism and non-small cell lung cancer deeply, we searched Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases. All analyses were done using RevMan 5.3 software which provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and Stata version 12.0. The statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the chi-square-based Q test. We used the random effects model as well as the fixed effects model to calculate the pooled ORs.Results: Our meta-analysis included 6 studies with a total of 1658 patients with non-small lung cancer and 2328 cancer-free control subjects. In all comparisons, we find none of genetic models shows significant relation with the risk of non-small lung cancer (recessive model: OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.43; dominant model: OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.37-1.06; co-dominant model: OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.94-2.83; allelic model: OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 0.98-1.48). However, when we proceeded to subgroup analysis according country, significantly increased risk was observed in a recessive models (OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15-1.59), in a co-dominant model: (OR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.76-3.53), in an allelic model (OR, 1.41, 95%CI, 1.24-1.61). Significantly decreased risk was observed in a dominant model (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.30-0.59).Conclusions: Our results indicate that p73 gene G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism is associated with the risk of non-small cell lung cancer in China. However, a large gene-to-environment research is required to confirm this conclusion.
P73多态性与非小细胞肺癌风险的meta分析
背景:p73基因g4c14 - a4t14多态性与非小细胞肺癌风险的关系尚不清楚。现在,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以阐明p73多态性与非小细胞肺癌的关系。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase、CNKI、万方、CBM等数据库,深入探讨p73多态性与非小细胞肺癌的关系。所有分析均使用Cochrane协作组提供的RevMan 5.3软件和Stata 12.0版本完成。采用基于卡方的Q检验评估各研究间的统计异质性。我们使用随机效应模型和固定效应模型来计算汇集的or。结果:我们的荟萃分析包括6项研究,共1658例非小细胞肺癌患者和2328例无癌对照。在所有的比较中,我们发现没有遗传模型与非小细胞肺癌的风险有显著关系(隐性模型:OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.43;优势模型:OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.37-1.06;共优势模型:OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.94-2.83;等位基因模型:OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 0.98-1.48)。然而,当我们根据国家进行亚组分析时,在隐性模型(OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15-1.59)、共显性模型(OR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.76-3.53)和等位基因模型(OR, 1.41, 95%CI, 1.24-1.61)中观察到显著增加的风险。在优势模型中观察到风险显著降低(OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.30-0.59)。结论:我们的研究结果表明p73基因g4c14 - a4t14多态性与中国非小细胞肺癌的风险相关。然而,这一结论需要大量的基因与环境的研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信