Reading Comprehension and Working Memory Capacity in Children with Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids

Lena Asker-Árnason, M. Wass, Fredrik K. Gustafsson, Birgitta Sahlén
{"title":"Reading Comprehension and Working Memory Capacity in Children with Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids","authors":"Lena Asker-Árnason, M. Wass, Fredrik K. Gustafsson, Birgitta Sahlén","doi":"10.17955/TVR.2015.115.1.728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading comprehension and three aspects of working memory—general, visuospatial and phonological—was assessed in 41 children with hearing loss: 23 with cochlear implants and 18 with hearing aids. Performance on these tests was compared between the two groups of children with hearing loss and also related to that of 55 children with typical hearing. All children were between 6 and 14 years of age. The children with hearing aids performed significantly more poorly on the reading comprehension test than the children with typical hearing but this difference was not significant between the children with cochlear implants and the children with typical hearing. In the group of children with cochlear implants, the results from the reading test and the results from all three working memory tests correlated significantly, whereas in the group of children with hearing aids there was no correlation between the reading test and the visual working memory test. The reading test results from the children with typical hearing correlated significantly with the results from the phonological working memory test but not with the other working memory tests. The authors concluded that the children with cochlear implants might have developed orthographic decoding earlier than the children with hearing aids due to their more profound hearing loss. (Less)","PeriodicalId":87459,"journal":{"name":"The Volta review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Volta review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17955/TVR.2015.115.1.728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Reading comprehension and three aspects of working memory—general, visuospatial and phonological—was assessed in 41 children with hearing loss: 23 with cochlear implants and 18 with hearing aids. Performance on these tests was compared between the two groups of children with hearing loss and also related to that of 55 children with typical hearing. All children were between 6 and 14 years of age. The children with hearing aids performed significantly more poorly on the reading comprehension test than the children with typical hearing but this difference was not significant between the children with cochlear implants and the children with typical hearing. In the group of children with cochlear implants, the results from the reading test and the results from all three working memory tests correlated significantly, whereas in the group of children with hearing aids there was no correlation between the reading test and the visual working memory test. The reading test results from the children with typical hearing correlated significantly with the results from the phonological working memory test but not with the other working memory tests. The authors concluded that the children with cochlear implants might have developed orthographic decoding earlier than the children with hearing aids due to their more profound hearing loss. (Less)
听力损失和人工耳蜗或助听器儿童的阅读理解和工作记忆能力
对41名听力损失儿童的阅读理解和工作记忆(一般记忆、视觉空间记忆和语音记忆)三个方面进行了评估,其中23名使用人工耳蜗,18名使用助听器。对两组听力损失儿童在这些测试中的表现进行了比较,并与55名听力正常的儿童进行了比较。所有儿童的年龄都在6至14岁之间。助听器儿童在阅读理解测试中的表现明显低于正常听力儿童,而人工耳蜗儿童与正常听力儿童的差异不显著。在人工耳蜗组中,阅读测试结果与三项工作记忆测试结果显著相关,而在助听器组中,阅读测试结果与视觉工作记忆测试结果无相关性。正常听力儿童的阅读测试结果与语音工作记忆测试结果显著相关,而与其他工作记忆测试结果无显著相关。作者得出结论,植入人工耳蜗的儿童可能比助听器儿童更早发展正字法解码,因为他们的听力损失更严重。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信