Relationships Between Physical Activity, Boredom Proneness, and Subjective Well-Being Among U.K. Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2 3区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1123/jsep.2021-0253

Ashley McCurdy, J. Stearns, R. Rhodes, D. Hopkins, K. Mummery, J. Spence

引用次数: 9

Abstract

This investigation sought to examine physical activity (PA) as a potential determinant of chronic boredom and associated well-being within the context of COVID-related restrictions. A representative sample of U.K. adults (N = 1,521) completed a survey on June 1, 2020. Bivariate analyses demonstrated that individuals who met guidelines and maintained or increased PA scored higher on life satisfaction, worthwhileness, and happiness and lower on anxiety (i.e., indicators of well-being) and boredom proneness (d = 0.13-0.43). Boredom proneness was correlated with all indicators of well-being (r = .38-.54). A series of regression models revealed that PA predicted lower boredom proneness and better life satisfaction, worthwhileness, and happiness. Boredom proneness accounted for the covariance between PA and well-being. Prospective research is needed to confirm causality of the observed relationships.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19大流行期间英国成年人体育活动、无聊倾向和主观幸福感之间的关系

本调查旨在研究在covid - 19相关限制的背景下，身体活动(PA)作为慢性无聊和相关幸福感的潜在决定因素。英国成年人的代表性样本(N = 1521)于2020年6月1日完成了一项调查。双变量分析表明，符合指南并维持或增加PA的个体在生活满意度、价值感和幸福感方面得分较高，而在焦虑(即幸福感指标)和无聊倾向方面得分较低(d = 0.13-0.43)。无聊倾向与所有幸福指标相关(r = 0.38 - 0.54)。一系列回归模型显示，PA预测较低的无聊倾向和较高的生活满意度，价值感和幸福感。无聊倾向解释了PA和幸福感之间的协方差。需要前瞻性研究来确认观察到的关系的因果关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 医学-心理学

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology (JSEP) is a peer-reviewed publication designed to stimulate and communicate research theory in all areas of sport and exercise psychology. JSEP emphasizes original research reports that advance our understanding of human behavior as it relates to sport and exercise. Comprehensive reviews employing both qualitative and quantitative methods are also encouraged, as well as brief reports of soundly designed research studies that are of special interest or importance. Areas of interest include research in social, clinical, developmental, and experimental psychology, as well as psychobiology and personality. Moreover, the terms sport and exercise may pertain to either the independent or dependent variables. Generally speaking, work on motor control processes, studies of sport as a social institution, or broader social issues are beyond the scope of JSEP. A wide variety of methods are acceptable for studying sport and exercise psychology topics.