Is Informal Employment a Result of Market Segmentation? Evidence from China

Jiro Nemoto, Hong Zuo
{"title":"Is Informal Employment a Result of Market Segmentation? Evidence from China","authors":"Jiro Nemoto, Hong Zuo","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.12228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many studies on informal employment have identified significant differences in wages and other aspects between workers engaged in formal and informal employment in China. However, whether informal employment is the result of a segmented labour market or a competitive labour market remains unclear. In this study, we empirically examined this issue and found that the informal labour market in China is both a segmented and a competitive labour market, with nearly half of workers in informal employment entering involuntarily in 2006. However, entry barriers are not observed for 2010.","PeriodicalId":11754,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many studies on informal employment have identified significant differences in wages and other aspects between workers engaged in formal and informal employment in China. However, whether informal employment is the result of a segmented labour market or a competitive labour market remains unclear. In this study, we empirically examined this issue and found that the informal labour market in China is both a segmented and a competitive labour market, with nearly half of workers in informal employment entering involuntarily in 2006. However, entry barriers are not observed for 2010.
非正规就业是市场分割的结果吗?来自中国的证据
许多关于非正式就业的研究发现,中国从事正式和非正式就业的工人在工资等方面存在显著差异。然而,非正规就业究竟是劳动力市场分割的结果,还是劳动力市场竞争的结果,仍然不清楚。在本研究中,我们对这一问题进行了实证研究,发现中国的非正规劳动力市场既是一个细分的劳动力市场,也是一个竞争激烈的劳动力市场,2006年有近一半的非正规劳动力是非自愿进入的。然而,2010年没有进入壁垒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信