Preschool and Childcare Expulsion

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Danielle DuShane, SeonYeong Yu
{"title":"Preschool and Childcare Expulsion","authors":"Danielle DuShane, SeonYeong Yu","doi":"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this review is to understand what has been learned over the past 20 years of research on preschool and childcare expulsions in the United States. Our literature search identified 16 research studies on this topic. An extensive review of the identified studies was conducted to critically examine the methods used to measure expulsion, the purposes of the reviewed studies, and interventions used to mitigate expulsion rates. Results from this review revealed that researchers have examined the rates of expulsion and factors that could influence expulsion, such as predictive and risk factors (e.g., demographics, disability status), teachers' roles, teacher–family relationships, and interventions. Notably, the reviewed studies highlighted high rates of expulsion among Black male students and students with disabilities. Many teachers reported high stress, limited access to resources, and challenging relationships with administrators and parents during the process of expulsion. Although a variety of methods (e.g., survey, interview, observation) were used to measure expulsion rates, surveys were the primary method of data collection. Interventions targeting teacher well-being, mental health consultation, and classroom-wide interventions (e.g., Pyramid Model) were found to be promising methods for reducing expulsions. Based on the results, gaps in the literature and implications for future research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47099,"journal":{"name":"Infants & Young Children","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infants & Young Children","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to understand what has been learned over the past 20 years of research on preschool and childcare expulsions in the United States. Our literature search identified 16 research studies on this topic. An extensive review of the identified studies was conducted to critically examine the methods used to measure expulsion, the purposes of the reviewed studies, and interventions used to mitigate expulsion rates. Results from this review revealed that researchers have examined the rates of expulsion and factors that could influence expulsion, such as predictive and risk factors (e.g., demographics, disability status), teachers' roles, teacher–family relationships, and interventions. Notably, the reviewed studies highlighted high rates of expulsion among Black male students and students with disabilities. Many teachers reported high stress, limited access to resources, and challenging relationships with administrators and parents during the process of expulsion. Although a variety of methods (e.g., survey, interview, observation) were used to measure expulsion rates, surveys were the primary method of data collection. Interventions targeting teacher well-being, mental health consultation, and classroom-wide interventions (e.g., Pyramid Model) were found to be promising methods for reducing expulsions. Based on the results, gaps in the literature and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
学前和儿童保育驱逐
本综述的目的是了解过去20年对美国学前和儿童保育驱逐的研究成果。我们的文献检索确定了关于该主题的16项研究。对已确定的研究进行了广泛的审查,以严格审查用于衡量驱逐的方法、审查研究的目的以及用于降低驱逐率的干预措施。本综述的结果显示,研究人员检查了开除率和可能影响开除的因素,如预测因素和风险因素(如人口统计学、残疾状况)、教师角色、教师与家庭关系和干预措施。值得注意的是,经过审查的研究强调了黑人男学生和残疾学生的开除率很高。许多教师报告说,在被开除的过程中,他们压力很大,获得资源的机会有限,与行政人员和家长的关系也很困难。虽然采用了多种方法(如调查、访谈、观察)来测量开除率,但调查是收集数据的主要方法。针对教师福祉的干预措施、心理健康咨询和班级范围的干预措施(如金字塔模型)被发现是减少驱逐的有希望的方法。在此基础上,讨论了文献中的差距以及对未来研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Infants & Young Children is an interdisciplinary journal focusing on vulnerable children from birth to five years of age and their families. Of special interest are articles involving innovative interventions, summaries of important research developments and their implications for practice, updates for high priority topic areas, balanced presentations of controversial issues, and articles that address issues involving policy, professional training, new conceptual models, and related matters. Although data are often presented primarily to illustrate points, some types of data-based articles may be appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信