J. Sherry
{"title":"Effects of 2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on fungal propagules in freshwater ponds","authors":"J. Sherry","doi":"10.1002/TOX.2530090308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of treatments with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) on fungal propagules in man-made freshwater ponds was studied as part of a larger investigation into the effects of the herbicide on the ponds' ecology and chemistry. Myriophyllum spicatum was planted in the ponds as a target plant; the ponds were allowed to stabilize before being treated with dimethylamine (DMA) and butoxyethylester derivatives of 2,4-D (1 mg/L). Although the 2,4-D treatments were highly toxic to M. spicatum in the ponds (B. F. Scott et al., 1985a) they did not have a clear effect on fungal propagule levels in either the water column or sediment, which indicates the absence of a primary effect. The mean levels of molds and “total fungi” in both pairs of treated ponds, and of yeasts in the DMA-treated ponds, tended to be depressed relative to the control ponds, for up to 114 days after treatment. That observation was reinforced by plots of the accumulated differences between the treated and control ponds. The differences between the mean fungal levels in the control and treated ponds were erratic, however, and the study's design did not permit a thorough statistical analysis of the data, although a multiple comparison test detected some differences (p < 0.05) between propagule levels, particularly molds, in the treated and control ponds. If real, the trends were probably a result of unidentified secondary effects of the pond treatments. The results imply that applications of 2,4-D to aquatic vegetation at realistic rates do not drastically affect fungal propagule levels in the water column or sediment. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc..","PeriodicalId":11824,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology & Water Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology & Water Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TOX.2530090308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
2,4‐二氯苯氧乙酸对淡水池塘真菌繁殖体的影响
研究了2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4- d)处理对人工淡水池塘真菌繁殖体的影响,作为该除草剂对池塘生态和化学影响的更大调查的一部分。在池塘中种植狐尾豆科植物作为目标植物;在用二甲胺(DMA)和2,4- d丁氧乙酯衍生物(1 mg/L)处理前,让池塘稳定下来。尽管2,4- d处理对池塘中的spicatum具有高毒性(B. F. Scott et al., 1985),但对水柱或沉积物中的真菌繁殖体水平没有明显影响,这表明没有主要影响。两组处理池中霉菌和“总真菌”的平均水平,以及dma处理池中酵母菌的平均水平,在处理后的114天内,相对于对照池有下降的趋势。处理池和对照池之间累积差异的图进一步证实了这一观察结果。然而,对照池和处理池中平均真菌水平之间的差异是不稳定的,并且研究的设计不允许对数据进行彻底的统计分析,尽管多次比较检验发现处理池和控制池中繁殖体水平之间存在一些差异(p < 0.05),特别是霉菌。如果这是真的,那么这种趋势很可能是池塘处理未确定的二次效应的结果。结果表明,以实际速率对水生植被施用2,4- d不会显著影响水柱或沉积物中的真菌繁殖体水平。©1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。