Efficacy of approved vaccines to prevent COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of reconstructed individual patient data from randomized trials.

Q3 Medicine
Alhassane Diallo, Miguel Carlos-Bolumbu, Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo, Alain Makinson, Florence Galtier
{"title":"Efficacy of approved vaccines to prevent COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of reconstructed individual patient data from randomized trials.","authors":"Alhassane Diallo, Miguel Carlos-Bolumbu, Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo, Alain Makinson, Florence Galtier","doi":"10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To optimize vaccination strategy, evidence on vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 is needed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present network meta-analysis uses reconstructed individual patient data from phase III trials on vaccine efficacy (VE), identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (CENTRAL) peer-reviewed and published in English before August 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the VE against confirmed COVID-19 at any time after the first dose as defined in each study. VE was re-estimated using the two-stage approach. Poisson regression models were applied to each trial at the first stage, and the incidence risk ratio (IRR) and their 95% CI were aggregated to allow random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) at the second stage. VE was expressed as: (1-IRR) × 100. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020200012).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies, evaluating nine different vaccines were identified and analyzed. Between April 23, 2020 and January 05, 2021, 210,418 participants were recruited in 354 sites worldwide. During a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 69.8 (69.7-70.3) days, 2131 confirmed COVID-19 cases occurred (604; 26.0 per 1000 person-years in vaccine recipients and 1527; 85.9 per 1000 person-years in the control group). The mRNA-1273 vaccine was the most effective (P-score 0.99); at any time after dose 1, incidence reduction for mRNA-1273 ranged from 78% to 98% compared to the other vaccines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results provide evidence for the short-term superiority of mRNA vaccines, especially the mRNA-1273 vaccine in prevention of COVID-19 in different populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":23839,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To optimize vaccination strategy, evidence on vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 is needed.

Method: The present network meta-analysis uses reconstructed individual patient data from phase III trials on vaccine efficacy (VE), identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (CENTRAL) peer-reviewed and published in English before August 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the VE against confirmed COVID-19 at any time after the first dose as defined in each study. VE was re-estimated using the two-stage approach. Poisson regression models were applied to each trial at the first stage, and the incidence risk ratio (IRR) and their 95% CI were aggregated to allow random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) at the second stage. VE was expressed as: (1-IRR) × 100. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020200012).

Results: A total of eight studies, evaluating nine different vaccines were identified and analyzed. Between April 23, 2020 and January 05, 2021, 210,418 participants were recruited in 354 sites worldwide. During a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 69.8 (69.7-70.3) days, 2131 confirmed COVID-19 cases occurred (604; 26.0 per 1000 person-years in vaccine recipients and 1527; 85.9 per 1000 person-years in the control group). The mRNA-1273 vaccine was the most effective (P-score 0.99); at any time after dose 1, incidence reduction for mRNA-1273 ranged from 78% to 98% compared to the other vaccines.

Conclusion: Our results provide evidence for the short-term superiority of mRNA vaccines, especially the mRNA-1273 vaccine in prevention of COVID-19 in different populations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1.

获批疫苗对预防 COVID-19 的功效:对随机试验中重建的患者个体数据进行系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
目的:为优化疫苗接种策略,需要有关 COVID-19 疫苗疗效的证据:本网络荟萃分析使用的是经 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆 (CENTRAL) 同行评审并在 2021 年 8 月 31 日之前以英文发表的有关疫苗疗效 (VE) 的 III 期试验中重建的患者个体数据。主要结果是每项研究中定义的在首次用药后的任何时间针对确诊的 COVID-19 的 VE。VE采用两阶段法重新估计。第一阶段对每项试验采用泊松回归模型,第二阶段汇总发病风险比 (IRR) 及其 95% CI,以进行随机效应网络荟萃分析 (NMA)。VE 表示为(1-IRR) ×100。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020200012)上注册:结果:共确定并分析了 8 项研究,评估了 9 种不同的疫苗。在 2020 年 4 月 23 日至 2021 年 1 月 5 日期间,全球 354 个地点共招募了 210,418 名参与者。在中位数(IQR)为69.8(69.7-70.3)天的随访期间,共发生了2131例COVID-19确诊病例(疫苗接种者为604例;每1000人年26.0例;对照组为1527例;每1000人年85.9例)。mRNA-1273疫苗最有效(P-score 0.99);与其他疫苗相比,mRNA-1273疫苗在第1剂后的任何时间都能降低78%到98%的发病率:我们的研究结果为mRNA疫苗,尤其是mRNA-1273疫苗在不同人群中预防COVID-19的短期优势提供了证据:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s10389-022-01707-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信