There's a Forest in Those Trees: Teaching About the Role of Corporations in Society

K. Greenfield
{"title":"There's a Forest in Those Trees: Teaching About the Role of Corporations in Society","authors":"K. Greenfield","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.195048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper was prepared for the University of Georgia School of Law Conference on Teaching Corporate Law, October 16, 1999. The paper argues that the basic corporate law course should focus much more on the questions surrounding the role of the corporation in society. In the typical corporate law course, little attention is given to the broad question of the position of the corporation within society at large or the narrower question of the relationship between the corporation and workers. The lack of consideration of these issues is odd indeed, since corporate law (like all law) is understandable only within a social and political context, and because, by any account, workers provide an essential input to a corporation's productive activities and have much to do with the success or failure of the enterprise. This paper explains why it is essential to focus our students' attention on these issues. Without such coverage, I argue, our courses will fail to address some of the most pressing political and economic matters of our day: the growing rift between the rich an poor, the stagnation of wages, the decrease in living standards for much of the population, and the fact that corporations (and corporate law) must share some of the blame. I suggest that the basic course should encourage our students to ask whether society as a whole would be better off if the law of the corporation or, more fundamentally, the nature of the corporation itself, were significantly if not radically changed. The paper also offers a concrete suggestion, namely a case corporate law professors can add to the basic course that can facilitate the discussions of these issues. This case is Local 1330 vs. US Steel, the Youngstown Steel plant closing case. The case offers an interesting and provocative way to discuss first principles of corporate law, that is, the questions of who owns the corporation and for what purposes the corporation exists.","PeriodicalId":81323,"journal":{"name":"Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.195048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper was prepared for the University of Georgia School of Law Conference on Teaching Corporate Law, October 16, 1999. The paper argues that the basic corporate law course should focus much more on the questions surrounding the role of the corporation in society. In the typical corporate law course, little attention is given to the broad question of the position of the corporation within society at large or the narrower question of the relationship between the corporation and workers. The lack of consideration of these issues is odd indeed, since corporate law (like all law) is understandable only within a social and political context, and because, by any account, workers provide an essential input to a corporation's productive activities and have much to do with the success or failure of the enterprise. This paper explains why it is essential to focus our students' attention on these issues. Without such coverage, I argue, our courses will fail to address some of the most pressing political and economic matters of our day: the growing rift between the rich an poor, the stagnation of wages, the decrease in living standards for much of the population, and the fact that corporations (and corporate law) must share some of the blame. I suggest that the basic course should encourage our students to ask whether society as a whole would be better off if the law of the corporation or, more fundamentally, the nature of the corporation itself, were significantly if not radically changed. The paper also offers a concrete suggestion, namely a case corporate law professors can add to the basic course that can facilitate the discussions of these issues. This case is Local 1330 vs. US Steel, the Youngstown Steel plant closing case. The case offers an interesting and provocative way to discuss first principles of corporate law, that is, the questions of who owns the corporation and for what purposes the corporation exists.
《树木中有一片森林:企业在社会中的角色教育》
本文是为1999年10月16日乔治亚大学法学院公司法教学会议准备的。本文认为,公司法基础课程应更多地关注围绕公司在社会中的作用的问题。在典型的公司法课程中,很少关注公司在整个社会中的地位这一广义问题,或公司与工人之间关系这一狭义问题。缺乏对这些问题的考虑确实很奇怪,因为公司法(像所有法律一样)只有在社会和政治背景下才能理解,因为无论如何,工人为公司的生产活动提供了必要的投入,与企业的成败有很大关系。本文解释了为什么我们的学生必须关注这些问题。我认为,如果没有这样的报道,我们的课程将无法解决当今一些最紧迫的政治和经济问题:贫富差距日益扩大,工资停滞不前,大多数人的生活水平下降,以及公司(和公司法)必须承担部分责任的事实。我建议,基础课程应该鼓励我们的学生提出这样的问题:如果公司法,或者更根本地说,如果公司本身的性质发生重大变化(如果不是彻底改变的话),整个社会是否会变得更好?本文还提出了具体的建议,即公司法教授可以在基础课程中增加一个案例,以促进对这些问题的讨论。这个案子是当地1330诉美国钢铁公司,扬斯敦钢铁厂关闭案。这个案例为讨论公司法的基本原则,即谁拥有公司以及公司存在的目的等问题,提供了一种有趣而富有争议的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书