In the United States, "Opt-Out" States Show No Increase in Access to Anesthesia Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Compared with Non-"Opt-Out" States.

E. Sun, T. R. Miller, Nicholas M. Halzack
{"title":"In the United States, \"Opt-Out\" States Show No Increase in Access to Anesthesia Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Compared with Non-\"Opt-Out\" States.","authors":"E. Sun, T. R. Miller, Nicholas M. Halzack","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Since 2001, 17 states have exercised their right to \"opt-out\" of the federal requirement that a physician supervise the administration of anesthesia by a nurse anesthetist, with the majority citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for their decision. By using Medicare data, we found that most (4 of 5) cohorts of \"opt-out\" states likely experienced smaller growth in anesthesia utilization rates compared with non-\"opt-out\" states, suggesting that opt-out was not associated with an increase in access to anesthesia care.","PeriodicalId":6824,"journal":{"name":"A&A Case Reports ","volume":"24 1","pages":"283-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A Case Reports ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Since 2001, 17 states have exercised their right to "opt-out" of the federal requirement that a physician supervise the administration of anesthesia by a nurse anesthetist, with the majority citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for their decision. By using Medicare data, we found that most (4 of 5) cohorts of "opt-out" states likely experienced smaller growth in anesthesia utilization rates compared with non-"opt-out" states, suggesting that opt-out was not associated with an increase in access to anesthesia care.
在美国,与非“选择退出”州相比,“选择退出”州的医疗保险受益人获得麻醉服务的机会没有增加。
在美国,麻醉护理可以由麻醉师或麻醉师护士提供。自2001年以来,已有17个州行使了“选择退出”联邦要求的权利,即由医生监督麻醉师护士的麻醉管理,大多数州认为麻醉护理的增加是他们做出决定的理由。通过使用医疗保险数据,我们发现,与非“选择退出”的州相比,“选择退出”州的大多数(5个中的4个)队列麻醉使用率的增长可能较小,这表明选择退出与麻醉护理的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信