Corrigendum for The risk of being culpable for or involved in a road crash after using cannabis: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Abstract

Jeff Brubacher was the corresponding author for one (Brubacher et al., 2019) of the 13 papers that we covered in our review of the relationship between the prior use of cannabis and the risk of being culpable for a road crash (White and Burns, 2021). Jeff identified an error in the value we selected to represent Brubacher et al’s adjusted cannabis-culpability odds ratio (OR) in our cannabis-culpability meta-analysis and meta-regression. We selected the value of 1.07 (0.98-1.20) that Brubacher et al. provided in their Table 3 for the “Model with THC in ng/ml”. Unfortunately, that value was for the slope of the (non-significant) linear relationship between the concentration of THC (in ng/ml) and the risk of being culpable for a crash, and not for the relationship of interest: the effect of the presence vs absence of THC on the risk of being culpable for a crash. Surprisingly, the value that we sought for the dichotomous cannabis variable was not provided anywhere in Brubacher et al’s paper.