Comparison of Encryption Algorithms for Wearable Devices in IoT Systems

Hao Zhou
{"title":"Comparison of Encryption Algorithms for Wearable Devices in IoT Systems","authors":"Hao Zhou","doi":"10.26855/ea.2023.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In industrial, medical, transportation and other key applications, the dependence on the Internet of Things applications is increasing rapidly, which has greatly changed the security landscape. In the past, enterprise applications generally had available resources to deal with security algorithms at any time, but nowadays, enterprise-level IoT applications are suffering from increasing threats, and their attack targets are the expanding network of resource-constrained IoT devices. When enterprises are eager to meet the rapidly emerging opportunities of the Internet of Things, the deployed IoT devices often fail to support basic security measures in function, so it is difficult to protect the stored data, and it is impossible to guarantee the exchange of data and commands on vulnerable networks. The thesis is about the comparison of encryption algorithms for wearable devices. Because the most popular wearable devices in the market are smartwatches, choosing the smartwatches as sample to analysis. Moreover, based on the current cryptographic protocol standards that are being used in IoT, choosing AES, PRESENT, RSA and ECC algorithms as the comparison in the encryption algorithms. Also, the hybrid algorithm called HAN show impressive potential and security in encryption.","PeriodicalId":72384,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering advances","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26855/ea.2023.04.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In industrial, medical, transportation and other key applications, the dependence on the Internet of Things applications is increasing rapidly, which has greatly changed the security landscape. In the past, enterprise applications generally had available resources to deal with security algorithms at any time, but nowadays, enterprise-level IoT applications are suffering from increasing threats, and their attack targets are the expanding network of resource-constrained IoT devices. When enterprises are eager to meet the rapidly emerging opportunities of the Internet of Things, the deployed IoT devices often fail to support basic security measures in function, so it is difficult to protect the stored data, and it is impossible to guarantee the exchange of data and commands on vulnerable networks. The thesis is about the comparison of encryption algorithms for wearable devices. Because the most popular wearable devices in the market are smartwatches, choosing the smartwatches as sample to analysis. Moreover, based on the current cryptographic protocol standards that are being used in IoT, choosing AES, PRESENT, RSA and ECC algorithms as the comparison in the encryption algorithms. Also, the hybrid algorithm called HAN show impressive potential and security in encryption.
物联网系统中可穿戴设备的加密算法比较
在工业、医疗、交通等关键应用中,对物联网应用的依赖正在迅速增加,极大地改变了安防格局。过去,企业应用通常随时都有可用的资源来处理安全算法,但如今,企业级物联网应用面临的威胁越来越大,其攻击目标是由资源受限的物联网设备组成的不断扩大的网络。当企业急于迎接快速涌现的物联网机遇时,所部署的物联网设备往往无法在功能上支持基本的安全措施,从而难以保护存储的数据,无法保证在脆弱网络上数据和命令的交换。本文是关于可穿戴设备加密算法的比较。因为市场上最流行的可穿戴设备是智能手表,所以选择智能手表作为样本进行分析。此外,根据目前物联网中使用的加密协议标准,在加密算法中选择AES、PRESENT、RSA和ECC算法进行比较。此外,混合算法HAN在加密方面也显示出令人印象深刻的潜力和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical engineering advances
Biomedical engineering advances Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信