Informal social accountability mechanisms for water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in childcare centres in Nairobi City County's informal settlements

Ivy Chumo , Caroline Kabaria , Kanyiva Muindi , Helen Elsey , Penelope A Phillips-Howard , Blessing Mberu
{"title":"Informal social accountability mechanisms for water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in childcare centres in Nairobi City County's informal settlements","authors":"Ivy Chumo ,&nbsp;Caroline Kabaria ,&nbsp;Kanyiva Muindi ,&nbsp;Helen Elsey ,&nbsp;Penelope A Phillips-Howard ,&nbsp;Blessing Mberu","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social accountability for water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services is a critical component to realising child rights to WASH services by the urban poor, more so in childcare centres. Despite the existence of discrete social accountability mechanisms (SAMs) in informal settlements, informal SAMs rarely form part of strategic approaches to addressing social accountability challenges in access to WASH services in childcare centres. The main objective of the study was to explore informal social accountability mechanisms for WASH in childcare centres in Korogocho and Viwandani informal settlements in Nairobi City County, Kenya. This qualitative study was an ethnography, where we administered governance diaries to 24 participants (parents and childcare managers) for 4 months. Data generated were analysed using a framework analysis derived from a principal-stewardship framework. Parents and centre managers, who are key actors for WASH services in childcare centres in informal settlements, relied on using informal SAMs. We identified three SAMs; (i) discretionary behaviours (rewards and sanctions, interpretation of rules and guidelines and peer mentorship); (ii) norms and values; and (iii) facilitative behaviours. The SAMs were interrelated and operated in synergy for access to WASH service by children in childcare centres. The SAMs for WASH used by parents and childcare owners in childcare centres encountered the following challenges; unrealistic expectations, negligence, conflicting expectations, conflicting agenda and administrative cultures, and tensions over performance standards and monitoring. Identified strategies for strengthening the SAMs included consistency in adhering to rules and guidelines for WASH service provision, and collaboration with strong WASH actors. Data from this study suggest it is valuable to examine and understand SAMs as this then offers clear pathways to mitigate problems and enact change in the WASH service delivery for improved global agenda of SDG 4 and SDG 6. Further, there is potential for joint advocacy for improved WASH services throughout the informal settlement. While SAMs are often conceptualised as a formal process or an intervention, this study shows that existing daily informal SAMs play an important role in promoting or maintaining WASH service delivery. Therefore, WASH stakeholders need to revisit, co-develop and evaluate informal SAMs for WASH service delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 259-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000419/pdfft?md5=6c8ab6f392c561365ec23c22943fd79f&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328622000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Social accountability for water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services is a critical component to realising child rights to WASH services by the urban poor, more so in childcare centres. Despite the existence of discrete social accountability mechanisms (SAMs) in informal settlements, informal SAMs rarely form part of strategic approaches to addressing social accountability challenges in access to WASH services in childcare centres. The main objective of the study was to explore informal social accountability mechanisms for WASH in childcare centres in Korogocho and Viwandani informal settlements in Nairobi City County, Kenya. This qualitative study was an ethnography, where we administered governance diaries to 24 participants (parents and childcare managers) for 4 months. Data generated were analysed using a framework analysis derived from a principal-stewardship framework. Parents and centre managers, who are key actors for WASH services in childcare centres in informal settlements, relied on using informal SAMs. We identified three SAMs; (i) discretionary behaviours (rewards and sanctions, interpretation of rules and guidelines and peer mentorship); (ii) norms and values; and (iii) facilitative behaviours. The SAMs were interrelated and operated in synergy for access to WASH service by children in childcare centres. The SAMs for WASH used by parents and childcare owners in childcare centres encountered the following challenges; unrealistic expectations, negligence, conflicting expectations, conflicting agenda and administrative cultures, and tensions over performance standards and monitoring. Identified strategies for strengthening the SAMs included consistency in adhering to rules and guidelines for WASH service provision, and collaboration with strong WASH actors. Data from this study suggest it is valuable to examine and understand SAMs as this then offers clear pathways to mitigate problems and enact change in the WASH service delivery for improved global agenda of SDG 4 and SDG 6. Further, there is potential for joint advocacy for improved WASH services throughout the informal settlement. While SAMs are often conceptualised as a formal process or an intervention, this study shows that existing daily informal SAMs play an important role in promoting or maintaining WASH service delivery. Therefore, WASH stakeholders need to revisit, co-develop and evaluate informal SAMs for WASH service delivery.

内罗毕市县非正规住区托儿中心的水卫生和个人卫生(WASH)非正式社会问责机制
水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)服务的社会问责制是城市贫民实现儿童享有WASH服务权利的关键组成部分,在托儿中心更是如此。尽管在非正式住区存在离散的社会问责机制,但非正式的社会问责机制很少成为解决托儿中心获得讲卫生服务方面的社会问责挑战的战略办法的一部分。该研究的主要目的是探讨肯尼亚内罗毕市县科罗戈乔和维旺达尼非正规住区托儿中心的WASH非正式社会问责机制。这项定性研究是一项民族志研究,我们对24名参与者(父母和托儿所管理者)进行了为期4个月的管理日记。所产生的数据使用从主要管理框架派生的框架分析进行分析。父母和中心管理人员是非正规住区托儿中心讲卫生服务的关键行为者,他们依赖于使用非正式的辅助服务体系。我们确定了三枚地对空导弹;(i)自由裁量行为(奖励和制裁、规则和准则的解释以及同伴指导);(ii)规范和价值观;(三)促进行为。辅助服务计划相互关联,协同运作,使托儿中心的儿童获得讲卫生服务。托儿中心的家长和托儿业主使用的讲卫生活动管理标准遇到了以下挑战:不切实际的期望、疏忽、冲突的期望、冲突的议程和行政文化,以及在绩效标准和监督方面的紧张关系。已确定的加强服务支持机制的战略包括一致遵守提供讲卫生服务的规则和准则,以及与强有力的讲卫生行为体合作。本研究的数据表明,检查和理解SAMs是有价值的,因为这为缓解问题和改变WASH服务提供提供了明确的途径,以改善可持续发展目标4和可持续发展目标6的全球议程。此外,有可能联合宣传改善整个非正式住区的讲卫生服务。虽然通常将辅助服务方案概念化为正式程序或干预措施,但这项研究表明,现有的日常非正式辅助服务方案在促进或维持讲卫生服务提供方面发挥着重要作用。因此,WASH的利益相关者需要重新审视、共同开发和评估非正式的SAMs,以提供WASH服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信