Defining Pedagogical Differentiation in Higher Education

E. Kanellopoulou, Maria Darra
{"title":"Defining Pedagogical Differentiation in Higher Education","authors":"E. Kanellopoulou, Maria Darra","doi":"10.5296/ije.v13i4.19209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is, through content analysis of 19 publications in the Greek and international literature in scientific texts, books, journal articles, and conferences, to investigate the conceptual content of pedagogical differentiation in higher education, as it emerges from the descriptions and discussion of authors, researchers, and experts. From the analysis, twelve dimensions or characteristics of pedagogical differentiation emerged that presented the highest frequency of occurrence in four broad categories. These are a. modification of the supportive learning context, meeting the needs of learners, and continuous improvement of the learning for all the learners who joined the category entitled \"processes\", b. student-centered teaching and learning, flexible learning context / flexible grouping and the possibility of learning option / multiple options as dimensions of a more general category called \"context\", c. the success and active participation of the learner in his learning, the development of life skills as well as the development of procedural knowledge skills that were included in the category called \"learning outcomes\" and d. the modification of \"learning\" products, the alternative / modern forms of assessment and the continuous assessment that were dimensions of the category \"assessment\". The results of the research show that the dimension with the highest frequency is a modification of the supportive learning context and follows in order of frequency of occurrence, the modification of learning \"products\" and meeting the needs of learners. Finally, the dimensions with the lowest frequency of occurrence include the continuous assessment and the development of procedural knowledge skills.","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v13i4.19209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is, through content analysis of 19 publications in the Greek and international literature in scientific texts, books, journal articles, and conferences, to investigate the conceptual content of pedagogical differentiation in higher education, as it emerges from the descriptions and discussion of authors, researchers, and experts. From the analysis, twelve dimensions or characteristics of pedagogical differentiation emerged that presented the highest frequency of occurrence in four broad categories. These are a. modification of the supportive learning context, meeting the needs of learners, and continuous improvement of the learning for all the learners who joined the category entitled "processes", b. student-centered teaching and learning, flexible learning context / flexible grouping and the possibility of learning option / multiple options as dimensions of a more general category called "context", c. the success and active participation of the learner in his learning, the development of life skills as well as the development of procedural knowledge skills that were included in the category called "learning outcomes" and d. the modification of "learning" products, the alternative / modern forms of assessment and the continuous assessment that were dimensions of the category "assessment". The results of the research show that the dimension with the highest frequency is a modification of the supportive learning context and follows in order of frequency of occurrence, the modification of learning "products" and meeting the needs of learners. Finally, the dimensions with the lowest frequency of occurrence include the continuous assessment and the development of procedural knowledge skills.
高等教育教学差异化的界定
本文的目的是,通过对希腊和国际科学文献、书籍、期刊文章和会议中的19种出版物的内容分析,调查高等教育中教学差异的概念内容,因为它来自作者、研究人员和专家的描述和讨论。从分析中,出现了在四大类中出现频率最高的教学分化的十二个维度或特征。这些方面包括:a.修改支持性学习环境,满足学习者的需要,并持续改进所有加入“过程”类别的学习者的学习;b.以学生为中心的教与学,灵活的学习环境/灵活的分组和学习选择/多种选择的可能性,作为更一般的“环境”类别的维度;c.学习者在学习中的成功和积极参与。生活技能的发展以及程序性知识技能的发展被列入“学习成果”类别和d.“学习”产品的修改、替代/现代形式的评估和持续评估,这些都是“评估”类别的维度。研究结果表明,频率最高的维度是对支持性学习情境的修改,其出现频率依次为对学习“产品”的修改和对学习者需求的满足。最后,出现频率最低的维度包括持续评估和程序性知识技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书