Prospective clinical study on the incidence of catheter-related complications in a neurological intensive care unit: 4 years of experience.

Q3 Medicine
Denise Bolis, Sonia D'Arrigo, Alessandro Bartesaghi, Cristina Panzeri, Paola Pelegalli, Alberto Steffanoni, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Mauro Pittiruti
{"title":"Prospective clinical study on the incidence of catheter-related complications in a neurological intensive care unit: 4 years of experience.","authors":"Denise Bolis, Sonia D'Arrigo, Alessandro Bartesaghi, Cristina Panzeri, Paola Pelegalli, Alberto Steffanoni, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Mauro Pittiruti","doi":"10.1177/11297298221097267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the past decades, significant efforts have been made to reduce early and late catheter-related complications in critically ill patients, using approaches based on bundles of evidence-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective clinical study, the authors evaluated the incidence of catheter-related complications in their neuro-intensive care unit during a 4-year period, adopting systematically the GAVeCeLT bundles for the insertion and management of all central venous access devices: centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs). All early/immediate and late complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 486 central lines (328 CICCs, 149 PICCs and 9 FICCs), the only clinically relevant early/immediate complication was primary tip malposition (1%). In regards late infective complications, the authors did not record any case of catheter-related bloodstream infection; though, they observed one case of central line associated blood stream infection (one CICC; 0.14/1000 catheter days), and 15 cases of catheter colonization (12 CICCs and 3 PICCs; 2.09 episodes/1000 catheter days). Late non-infective complications were few: 14 accidental dislodgments (2.9%), 18 irreversible lumen occlusions (3.7%), and no episodes of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis or tip migration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic adoption of the GAVeCeLT bundles for CVAD insertion and maintenance was associated with a minimization of catheter-related complications. The strict adherence to the recommendations included in these bundles was the major determinant for clinical success.</p>","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298221097267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past decades, significant efforts have been made to reduce early and late catheter-related complications in critically ill patients, using approaches based on bundles of evidence-based interventions.

Methods: In this prospective clinical study, the authors evaluated the incidence of catheter-related complications in their neuro-intensive care unit during a 4-year period, adopting systematically the GAVeCeLT bundles for the insertion and management of all central venous access devices: centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs). All early/immediate and late complications were recorded.

Results: On 486 central lines (328 CICCs, 149 PICCs and 9 FICCs), the only clinically relevant early/immediate complication was primary tip malposition (1%). In regards late infective complications, the authors did not record any case of catheter-related bloodstream infection; though, they observed one case of central line associated blood stream infection (one CICC; 0.14/1000 catheter days), and 15 cases of catheter colonization (12 CICCs and 3 PICCs; 2.09 episodes/1000 catheter days). Late non-infective complications were few: 14 accidental dislodgments (2.9%), 18 irreversible lumen occlusions (3.7%), and no episodes of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis or tip migration.

Conclusion: The systematic adoption of the GAVeCeLT bundles for CVAD insertion and maintenance was associated with a minimization of catheter-related complications. The strict adherence to the recommendations included in these bundles was the major determinant for clinical success.

神经重症监护病房导管相关并发症发生率的前瞻性临床研究:4 年的经验。
简介在过去的几十年中,为了减少危重病人的早期和晚期导管相关并发症,人们做出了巨大的努力,并采用了基于循证干预捆绑的方法:在这项前瞻性临床研究中,作者评估了神经重症监护病房在 4 年内导管相关并发症的发生率,系统地采用了 GAVeCeLT 套件来插入和管理所有中心静脉通路设备:中心置入中心导管 (CICC)、外周置入中心导管 (PICC) 和股置入中心导管 (FICC)。所有早期/即刻和晚期并发症均记录在案:在 486 例中心静脉置管(328 例 CICC、149 例 PICC 和 9 例 FICC)中,唯一与临床相关的早期/近期并发症是原发性尖端错位(1%)。关于晚期感染性并发症,作者没有记录任何导管相关血流感染病例;不过,他们观察到一例中心管路相关血流感染(1 例 CICC;0.14 次/1000 个导管日)和 15 例导管定植(12 例 CICC 和 3 例 PICC;2.09 次/1000 个导管日)。晚期非感染性并发症很少:14例意外脱落(2.9%),18例不可逆性管腔闭塞(3.7%),无症状性导管相关血栓或尖端移位:结论:系统性地采用 GAVeCeLT 套件进行 CVAD 植入和维护可最大限度地减少导管相关并发症。严格遵守这些指南中的建议是临床成功的主要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信