{"title":"Reading Self-Efficacy: Is There a Relationship between Progress and Psychological States","authors":"Jincheng Zeng, Noor Hanim Rahmat","doi":"10.5296/ije.v14i4.20290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading involves a complex process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through the reader’s interaction and involvement with written language. Readings is often a self-guided behavior, readers need self-efficacy as a key motivator for reading(McLean and Poulshock 2018). Self-efficacy in reading is conceived as readers’ belief in their abilities to accomplish desired outcomes (Ortlied & Schatz, 2020). Studies have shown that self-efficacy is significantly positively related to reading comprehension performance(Li and Wang 2010, Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019). While correlational research on self-efficacy and reading comprehension has been plentiful, less abundant are studies exploring factors influencing readers’ self-efficacy. This study is done to explore factors that influence EFL reader self-efficacy. A total of 660 non-English major undergraduate students at a Chinese university participated the study. A 5 Likert scales questionnaire on reading self-efficacy was used as an instrument to collect data. The scale used are: 1- strongly disagree; 2-disagree; 3-undecided; 4-agree; 5-strongly agree. The questionnaire was adapted from the Reading Self-Efficacy Scale (RSES) by Kassem (2013). Two factors – progress (14 items) and psychological states (12 items) were the same as RSES. Findings revealed that there are correlations for progress and positive psychological states. Findings also showed that there are correlations for progress and negative psychological states. These findings bear implications in the teaching of reading among undergraduates so that readers’ self-efficacy can be improved to gain progress in their reading experience in universities.","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i4.20290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reading involves a complex process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through the reader’s interaction and involvement with written language. Readings is often a self-guided behavior, readers need self-efficacy as a key motivator for reading(McLean and Poulshock 2018). Self-efficacy in reading is conceived as readers’ belief in their abilities to accomplish desired outcomes (Ortlied & Schatz, 2020). Studies have shown that self-efficacy is significantly positively related to reading comprehension performance(Li and Wang 2010, Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019). While correlational research on self-efficacy and reading comprehension has been plentiful, less abundant are studies exploring factors influencing readers’ self-efficacy. This study is done to explore factors that influence EFL reader self-efficacy. A total of 660 non-English major undergraduate students at a Chinese university participated the study. A 5 Likert scales questionnaire on reading self-efficacy was used as an instrument to collect data. The scale used are: 1- strongly disagree; 2-disagree; 3-undecided; 4-agree; 5-strongly agree. The questionnaire was adapted from the Reading Self-Efficacy Scale (RSES) by Kassem (2013). Two factors – progress (14 items) and psychological states (12 items) were the same as RSES. Findings revealed that there are correlations for progress and positive psychological states. Findings also showed that there are correlations for progress and negative psychological states. These findings bear implications in the teaching of reading among undergraduates so that readers’ self-efficacy can be improved to gain progress in their reading experience in universities.
阅读是一个复杂的过程,通过读者与书面语言的互动和参与,同时提取和构建意义。阅读通常是一种自我引导的行为,读者需要自我效能感作为阅读的关键动力(麦克莱恩和波尔肖克,2018)。阅读中的自我效能感被认为是读者对自己完成预期结果的能力的信念(ortly&schatz, 2020)。研究表明,自我效能感与阅读理解表现呈显著正相关(Li and Wang 2010; Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019)。虽然对自我效能感与阅读理解的相关研究很多,但对读者自我效能感影响因素的研究较少。本研究旨在探讨影响英语读者自我效能感的因素。一所中国大学的660名非英语专业的本科生参与了这项研究。采用李克特阅读自我效能5量表进行数据收集。使用的量表是:1-非常不同意;2-disagree;3-undecided;4-agree;5完全同意。问卷改编自Kassem(2013)的阅读自我效能量表(RSES)。进步(14项)和心理状态(12项)两个因素与RSES相同。研究结果显示,进步与积极心理状态之间存在相关性。研究结果还表明,进步与消极心理状态之间存在相关性。这些研究结果对大学生阅读教学具有一定的启示意义,可以提高大学生的阅读自我效能感,从而提高大学生的阅读体验。