Reading Self-Efficacy: Is There a Relationship between Progress and Psychological States

Jincheng Zeng, Noor Hanim Rahmat
{"title":"Reading Self-Efficacy: Is There a Relationship between Progress and Psychological States","authors":"Jincheng Zeng, Noor Hanim Rahmat","doi":"10.5296/ije.v14i4.20290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading involves a complex process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through the reader’s interaction and involvement with written language. Readings is often a self-guided behavior, readers need self-efficacy as a key motivator for reading(McLean and Poulshock 2018). Self-efficacy in reading is conceived as readers’ belief in their abilities to accomplish desired outcomes (Ortlied & Schatz, 2020). Studies have shown that self-efficacy is significantly positively related to reading comprehension performance(Li and Wang 2010, Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019). While correlational research on self-efficacy and reading comprehension has been plentiful, less abundant are studies exploring factors influencing readers’ self-efficacy. This study is done to explore factors that influence EFL reader self-efficacy. A total of 660 non-English major undergraduate students at a Chinese university participated the study. A 5 Likert scales questionnaire on reading self-efficacy was used as an instrument to collect data. The scale used are: 1- strongly disagree; 2-disagree; 3-undecided; 4-agree; 5-strongly agree. The questionnaire was adapted from the Reading Self-Efficacy Scale (RSES) by Kassem (2013). Two factors – progress (14 items) and psychological states (12 items) were the same as RSES. Findings revealed that there are correlations for progress and positive psychological states. Findings also showed that there are correlations for progress and negative psychological states. These findings bear implications in the teaching of reading among undergraduates so that readers’ self-efficacy can be improved to gain progress in their reading experience in universities.","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i4.20290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading involves a complex process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through the reader’s interaction and involvement with written language. Readings is often a self-guided behavior, readers need self-efficacy as a key motivator for reading(McLean and Poulshock 2018). Self-efficacy in reading is conceived as readers’ belief in their abilities to accomplish desired outcomes (Ortlied & Schatz, 2020). Studies have shown that self-efficacy is significantly positively related to reading comprehension performance(Li and Wang 2010, Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019). While correlational research on self-efficacy and reading comprehension has been plentiful, less abundant are studies exploring factors influencing readers’ self-efficacy. This study is done to explore factors that influence EFL reader self-efficacy. A total of 660 non-English major undergraduate students at a Chinese university participated the study. A 5 Likert scales questionnaire on reading self-efficacy was used as an instrument to collect data. The scale used are: 1- strongly disagree; 2-disagree; 3-undecided; 4-agree; 5-strongly agree. The questionnaire was adapted from the Reading Self-Efficacy Scale (RSES) by Kassem (2013). Two factors – progress (14 items) and psychological states (12 items) were the same as RSES. Findings revealed that there are correlations for progress and positive psychological states. Findings also showed that there are correlations for progress and negative psychological states. These findings bear implications in the teaching of reading among undergraduates so that readers’ self-efficacy can be improved to gain progress in their reading experience in universities.
阅读自我效能:进步与心理状态之间是否存在关系
阅读是一个复杂的过程,通过读者与书面语言的互动和参与,同时提取和构建意义。阅读通常是一种自我引导的行为,读者需要自我效能感作为阅读的关键动力(麦克莱恩和波尔肖克,2018)。阅读中的自我效能感被认为是读者对自己完成预期结果的能力的信念(ortly&schatz, 2020)。研究表明,自我效能感与阅读理解表现呈显著正相关(Li and Wang 2010; Shehzad, Alghorbany et al. 2019)。虽然对自我效能感与阅读理解的相关研究很多,但对读者自我效能感影响因素的研究较少。本研究旨在探讨影响英语读者自我效能感的因素。一所中国大学的660名非英语专业的本科生参与了这项研究。采用李克特阅读自我效能5量表进行数据收集。使用的量表是:1-非常不同意;2-disagree;3-undecided;4-agree;5完全同意。问卷改编自Kassem(2013)的阅读自我效能量表(RSES)。进步(14项)和心理状态(12项)两个因素与RSES相同。研究结果显示,进步与积极心理状态之间存在相关性。研究结果还表明,进步与消极心理状态之间存在相关性。这些研究结果对大学生阅读教学具有一定的启示意义,可以提高大学生的阅读自我效能感,从而提高大学生的阅读体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书