Non-Profit Social Purpose and Social Enterprise Outcome Themes That Transfer to Businesses

Stuart C. Mendel
{"title":"Non-Profit Social Purpose and Social Enterprise Outcome Themes That Transfer to Businesses","authors":"Stuart C. Mendel","doi":"10.33423/ajm.v22i3.5630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The attention cast toward social enterprise since the mid to late 1990s by private businesses, nonprofit human service organizations, and public sector stakeholders has driven interest in the best ways to measure social mission-related outcomes and whether or not such endeavors truly achieve impactful change. Little clarity from the methodological models has emerged to inform social mission outcome measurement due in part to the blurring of cross-sector principles underlying the tasks at hand. A barrier is that businesses engaged in social mission must make choices that redefine profit-making, and it is a rare case where nonprofit and social purpose organization (SPO) evaluation models trace whether or not and to what degree their efforts have led to the social outcomes they profess to accomplish. This essay depicts the compromises and accommodations leaders and decision makers among five case examples encompassing philanthropic, nonprofit human services and social service providers, government and business actors make in their social enterprise work toward social mission outcomes and impact.","PeriodicalId":91998,"journal":{"name":"American journal of information management","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v22i3.5630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The attention cast toward social enterprise since the mid to late 1990s by private businesses, nonprofit human service organizations, and public sector stakeholders has driven interest in the best ways to measure social mission-related outcomes and whether or not such endeavors truly achieve impactful change. Little clarity from the methodological models has emerged to inform social mission outcome measurement due in part to the blurring of cross-sector principles underlying the tasks at hand. A barrier is that businesses engaged in social mission must make choices that redefine profit-making, and it is a rare case where nonprofit and social purpose organization (SPO) evaluation models trace whether or not and to what degree their efforts have led to the social outcomes they profess to accomplish. This essay depicts the compromises and accommodations leaders and decision makers among five case examples encompassing philanthropic, nonprofit human services and social service providers, government and business actors make in their social enterprise work toward social mission outcomes and impact.
非营利性社会目的和社会企业成果主题转移到企业
自20世纪90年代中后期以来,私营企业、非营利人类服务组织和公共部门利益相关者对社会企业的关注推动了人们对衡量社会使命相关结果的最佳方法的兴趣,以及这些努力是否真正实现了有影响力的变化。在衡量社会使命结果的方法模型中,很少有明确的内容出现,部分原因是当前任务背后的跨部门原则模糊不清。一个障碍是,从事社会使命的企业必须做出重新定义盈利的选择,而非营利组织和社会目的组织(SPO)的评估模型很少追踪他们的努力是否以及在多大程度上导致了他们声称要实现的社会结果。这篇文章描述了五个案例中的妥协和住宿领导者和决策者,包括慈善,非营利人类服务和社会服务提供者,政府和商业行为者在他们的社会企业工作中为社会使命的结果和影响做出的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信