Calculation of measurement uncertainty of biochemical parameters

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
C. Bal, M. Serdar, O. T. Güngör, H. Celik, S. Abuşoğlu, N. Uğuz, G. Erden, M. Yıldırımkaya
{"title":"Calculation of measurement uncertainty of biochemical parameters","authors":"C. Bal, M. Serdar, O. T. Güngör, H. Celik, S. Abuşoğlu, N. Uğuz, G. Erden, M. Yıldırımkaya","doi":"10.5505/TJB.2014.04127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is the calculation of measurement uncertainty values of ten different biochemical parameters by using internal and external quality control datas with three different, but same model and trademark device and the comparison of these values with Fraser’s and CLIA’s total allowable error % (TEa%) values. Methods: In the calculation of measurement uncertainty, six step “uncertainty calculation model”, that is defined in Nordest guide which is based on European Accreditation Guideline / 12 /, European Technical Report: 1 / 3 / and ISO / DTS 21748 Guideline / 8 / was used. Results: TEa% values of blood urea nitrogen for Device A, potassium values for Device B and albumin, creatinine, sodium and total protein values for Device C were found to be higher when compared to TEa% values of Fraser. TEa% of blood urea nitrogen, which has been calculated for Device A, B and C was found to be higher when compared to TEa% values of CLIA. TEa% values which has been calculated for glucose, AST, cholesterol and triglyceride in each three device was not found to be higher than TEa% values of CLIA and Fraser. Conclusion: Laboratories should establish the model for calculation of uncertainity measurement and evaluation criterias and take the analytical difference between devices under control. Also they should give the results which are not exceeding the targeted TEa% values and should inform the clinicians about it.","PeriodicalId":23355,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJB.2014.04127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is the calculation of measurement uncertainty values of ten different biochemical parameters by using internal and external quality control datas with three different, but same model and trademark device and the comparison of these values with Fraser’s and CLIA’s total allowable error % (TEa%) values. Methods: In the calculation of measurement uncertainty, six step “uncertainty calculation model”, that is defined in Nordest guide which is based on European Accreditation Guideline / 12 /, European Technical Report: 1 / 3 / and ISO / DTS 21748 Guideline / 8 / was used. Results: TEa% values of blood urea nitrogen for Device A, potassium values for Device B and albumin, creatinine, sodium and total protein values for Device C were found to be higher when compared to TEa% values of Fraser. TEa% of blood urea nitrogen, which has been calculated for Device A, B and C was found to be higher when compared to TEa% values of CLIA. TEa% values which has been calculated for glucose, AST, cholesterol and triglyceride in each three device was not found to be higher than TEa% values of CLIA and Fraser. Conclusion: Laboratories should establish the model for calculation of uncertainity measurement and evaluation criterias and take the analytical difference between devices under control. Also they should give the results which are not exceeding the targeted TEa% values and should inform the clinicians about it.
生化参数测量不确定度的计算
目的:利用三种不同型号、相同商标装置的内外质控数据,计算10种不同生化参数的测量不确定度值,并与Fraser和CLIA的总允许误差% (TEa%)值进行比较。方法:在测量不确定度计算中,采用Nordest指南中定义的基于欧洲认可指南/ 12 /、欧洲技术报告:1 / 3 /和ISO / DTS 21748指南/ 8 /的六步“不确定度计算模型”。结果:与Fraser的TEa%值相比,A装置的血尿素氮TEa%值、B装置的血钾TEa%值和C装置的白蛋白、肌酐、钠和总蛋白TEa%值更高。与CLIA的TEa%值相比,A、B、C设备计算的血尿素氮TEa%值更高。三种装置计算的葡萄糖、AST、胆固醇和甘油三酯的TEa%值均未高于CLIA和Fraser的TEa%值。结论:实验室应建立不确定度测量和评价标准的计算模型,控制设备间的分析差异。此外,他们应该给出不超过目标TEa%值的结果,并应告知临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Biochemistry (TJB), official journal of Turkish Biochemical Society, is issued electronically every 2 months. The main aim of the journal is to support the research and publishing culture by ensuring that every published manuscript has an added value and thus providing international acceptance of the “readability” of the manuscripts published in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信