Survival and Recurrence in Pancreatobiliary Versus Intestinal Histology of Ampullary Carcinoma

M. Moslim, Hailan Liu, M. Lefton, K. Ruth, Rajeswari Nagarathinam, H. Cooper, S. Reddy
{"title":"Survival and Recurrence in Pancreatobiliary Versus Intestinal Histology of Ampullary Carcinoma","authors":"M. Moslim, Hailan Liu, M. Lefton, K. Ruth, Rajeswari Nagarathinam, H. Cooper, S. Reddy","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ampullary carcinoma is rare with a more favourable prognosis compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The role of histological classification, including pancreatobiliary (PB) and intestinal (INT), on survival and recurrence outcomes in ampullary cancer is still debatable.\nMethods: 42 patients were identified between 1996-2010.\nResults: Nineteen classic pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) and 23 pylorus-preserving PDs were performed. Pathological review revealed 23, 18 and 1 patients with the PB, INT and mixed histology, respectively. Adjuvant chemoradiation (ACRT), chemotherapy, and radiation were given to 14 (33.3%), 4 (9.5%) and 2 (4.8%) patients, respectively. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of surgery were higher in the PB histological variant compared to INT (p=0.005 and 0.012, respectively). A landmark (LM) analysis found higher survival in the PB variant patients compared to INT (RFS p=0.023; OS p=0.048). There was no difference in RFS between both histological variants for patients who underwent surgery alone (p=0.42). However, the PB had higher RFS compared to the INT histology for patients who underwent ACRT (p=0.008).\nConclusion: Ampullary carcinoma with PB histological variant was associated with significant survival benefit. The PB versus INT survival benefit was seen in the setting of ACRT, but not with surgery alone.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ampullary carcinoma is rare with a more favourable prognosis compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The role of histological classification, including pancreatobiliary (PB) and intestinal (INT), on survival and recurrence outcomes in ampullary cancer is still debatable. Methods: 42 patients were identified between 1996-2010. Results: Nineteen classic pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) and 23 pylorus-preserving PDs were performed. Pathological review revealed 23, 18 and 1 patients with the PB, INT and mixed histology, respectively. Adjuvant chemoradiation (ACRT), chemotherapy, and radiation were given to 14 (33.3%), 4 (9.5%) and 2 (4.8%) patients, respectively. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of surgery were higher in the PB histological variant compared to INT (p=0.005 and 0.012, respectively). A landmark (LM) analysis found higher survival in the PB variant patients compared to INT (RFS p=0.023; OS p=0.048). There was no difference in RFS between both histological variants for patients who underwent surgery alone (p=0.42). However, the PB had higher RFS compared to the INT histology for patients who underwent ACRT (p=0.008). Conclusion: Ampullary carcinoma with PB histological variant was associated with significant survival benefit. The PB versus INT survival benefit was seen in the setting of ACRT, but not with surgery alone.
壶腹癌胰胆管与肠组织学的生存与复发
背景:壶腹癌比较少见,预后较胰管腺癌好。组织学分类,包括胰胆(PB)和肠(INT),对壶腹癌的生存和复发结果的作用仍有争议。方法:1996-2010年共收治42例患者。结果:共行经典胰十二指肠切除术19例,保幽门胰十二指肠切除术23例。病理检查显示PB 23例,INT 18例,混合型1例。辅助放化疗(ACRT) 14例(33.3%),化疗4例(9.5%),放疗2例(4.8%)。与INT组相比,PB组的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)高于INT组(p=0.005和0.012)。一项里程碑式(LM)分析发现,与INT相比,PB变异患者的生存率更高(RFS p=0.023;操作系统p = 0.048)。单独接受手术的两种组织学变异患者的RFS没有差异(p=0.42)。然而,与接受ACRT的患者相比,PB的RFS高于INT组织学(p=0.008)。结论:壶腹癌合并PB组织学变异患者的生存获益显著。在ACRT的情况下,PB和INT的生存获益被观察到,但不是单独的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信