Effects of the McKenzie protocol on pregnancy- related back pain -

O. Ayanniyi, A. O. Sanya, O. S. Ogunlade
{"title":"Effects of the McKenzie protocol on pregnancy- related back pain -","authors":"O. Ayanniyi, A. O. Sanya, O. S. Ogunlade","doi":"10.5455/JEIM.140916.OR.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Back pain (BP) is a common complaint of women during pregnancy, and it constituted a burden to the affected individuals. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of McKenzie protocol (MP) in managing pregnancy-related BP among women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with pregnancy-related BP were purposively recruited and randomly assigned to McKenzie protocol plus usual care (MPG) and Usual care only (UCG). The participants in the MPG were treated with MP in addition to the usual care. The women in the UCG received usual care only. Participants were treated within six weeks and then assessed. Pre and post-intervention pain intensity and disability level were assessed using Numerical pain rating scale and Modified Ronald Morris Disability Questionnaires. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the independent t-test comparison of the pre-treatment pain intensity [LBP (p = 0 . 989), HBP (p = 0 .306), PGP (0 .296)] and functional disability scores [LBP (p = 0. 483); HBP (p = 0. 306), PGP(P = 0. 209)] between MPG and UCG respectively. At the end of the 6 weeks of intervention the independent t-test comparison of the post-treatment pain and disability scores of the participants in the MPG and UCG showed statistically significant difference in pain intensity score reduction [LBP (p = 0. 001), HBP (p = 0. 001), PGP (p = 0. 001)] and disability score reduction [LBP (p = 0. 001), HBP (p = 0. 001), PGP (p = 0. 001)] respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of McKenzie protocol to usual care produced significant relief from back pain and disability of participants in the MPG at the end of six weeks intervention irrespective of back pain types. It is recommended that McKenzie protocol should be considered in the management of pregnancy- related back pain. Keywords: McKenzie protocol, usual care, pregnancy- related back pain.","PeriodicalId":16091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental and Integrative Medicine","volume":"112 1","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEIM.140916.OR.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Back pain (BP) is a common complaint of women during pregnancy, and it constituted a burden to the affected individuals. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of McKenzie protocol (MP) in managing pregnancy-related BP among women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with pregnancy-related BP were purposively recruited and randomly assigned to McKenzie protocol plus usual care (MPG) and Usual care only (UCG). The participants in the MPG were treated with MP in addition to the usual care. The women in the UCG received usual care only. Participants were treated within six weeks and then assessed. Pre and post-intervention pain intensity and disability level were assessed using Numerical pain rating scale and Modified Ronald Morris Disability Questionnaires. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the independent t-test comparison of the pre-treatment pain intensity [LBP (p = 0 . 989), HBP (p = 0 .306), PGP (0 .296)] and functional disability scores [LBP (p = 0. 483); HBP (p = 0. 306), PGP(P = 0. 209)] between MPG and UCG respectively. At the end of the 6 weeks of intervention the independent t-test comparison of the post-treatment pain and disability scores of the participants in the MPG and UCG showed statistically significant difference in pain intensity score reduction [LBP (p = 0. 001), HBP (p = 0. 001), PGP (p = 0. 001)] and disability score reduction [LBP (p = 0. 001), HBP (p = 0. 001), PGP (p = 0. 001)] respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of McKenzie protocol to usual care produced significant relief from back pain and disability of participants in the MPG at the end of six weeks intervention irrespective of back pain types. It is recommended that McKenzie protocol should be considered in the management of pregnancy- related back pain. Keywords: McKenzie protocol, usual care, pregnancy- related back pain.
麦肯齐方案对妊娠相关背痛的影响
摘要简介与目的:腰痛(BP)是妊娠期妇女常见的主诉,对患者构成了负担。本研究的目的是确定麦肯齐方案(MP)在管理妇女妊娠相关BP中的作用。材料和方法:有目的地招募妊娠相关BP的妇女,并随机分配到麦肯齐方案加常规护理(MPG)和仅常规护理(UCG)。MPG的参与者在常规护理的基础上接受MP治疗。UCG中的妇女只接受常规护理。参与者在六周内接受治疗,然后进行评估。采用数值疼痛评定量表和改良的Ronald Morris残疾问卷评估干预前后的疼痛强度和残疾水平。获得的数据使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析。结果:两组治疗前疼痛强度[LBP]的独立t检验比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.05)。[989], HBP (p = 0.306), PGP(0.296)]和功能障碍评分[LBP (p = 0.96)]。483);HBP (p = 0。306), pgp (p = 0。[209]在MPG和UCG之间。干预6周结束时,受试者MPG和UCG治疗后疼痛和失能评分的独立t检验比较,疼痛强度评分降低[LBP]差异有统计学意义(p = 0。0.001), HBP (p = 0。0.001), PGP (p = 0。[p = 0.01]和残疾评分降低[LBP] (p = 0.01)。0.001), HBP (p = 0。0.001), PGP (p = 0。分别为001)。结论:在常规护理的基础上加入麦肯齐方案,在六周干预结束时,无论背痛类型如何,MPG参与者的背痛和残疾都得到了显著缓解。建议在妊娠相关腰痛的治疗中考虑麦肯齐方案。关键词:麦肯齐方案,常规护理,妊娠相关腰痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信