The well-being of older age Lithuanians: Policy implications

Antanas Kairys, Olga Zamalijeva, A. Bagdonas, Jonas Eimontas, V. Pakalniškienė, Raimonda Sadauskaitė
{"title":"The well-being of older age Lithuanians: Policy implications","authors":"Antanas Kairys, Olga Zamalijeva, A. Bagdonas, Jonas Eimontas, V. Pakalniškienė, Raimonda Sadauskaitė","doi":"10.15388/psichol.2021.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries of the world consider the well-being of citizens to be one of their most important goals. Nowadays there is a growing concern about the well-being of older people. Considering the aging population, there is a call for social policies aimed at strengthening the well-being of older people. Therefore, recommendations were prepared for policymakers on possible ways to strengthen the well-being of the older age Lithuanian population. The recommendations are based on data from the 7th wave of the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). There were 2014 persons aged 50 and older interviewed in Lithuania in the 7th wave of the SHARE survey. Data on various aspects of well-being, health, work and economic situation, childhood circumstances, experiences of discrimination were analyzed. Based on different aspects of well-being it was found, that respondents can be grouped into high, low, and medium well-being clusters, moreover the analysis showed that the Lithuanian population has relatively low well-being compared to other countries. Recommendations were formulated covering possible measures for chronic diseases, co-morbid mental health disorders, work, economic situation, childhood environment, and personal life history. The recommendations are addressed to health, social and employment, education, and science policymakers.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/psichol.2021.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries of the world consider the well-being of citizens to be one of their most important goals. Nowadays there is a growing concern about the well-being of older people. Considering the aging population, there is a call for social policies aimed at strengthening the well-being of older people. Therefore, recommendations were prepared for policymakers on possible ways to strengthen the well-being of the older age Lithuanian population. The recommendations are based on data from the 7th wave of the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). There were 2014 persons aged 50 and older interviewed in Lithuania in the 7th wave of the SHARE survey. Data on various aspects of well-being, health, work and economic situation, childhood circumstances, experiences of discrimination were analyzed. Based on different aspects of well-being it was found, that respondents can be grouped into high, low, and medium well-being clusters, moreover the analysis showed that the Lithuanian population has relatively low well-being compared to other countries. Recommendations were formulated covering possible measures for chronic diseases, co-morbid mental health disorders, work, economic situation, childhood environment, and personal life history. The recommendations are addressed to health, social and employment, education, and science policymakers.
立陶宛老年人的福祉:政策影响
世界上许多国家都把公民的福祉视为其最重要的目标之一。如今,人们越来越关注老年人的福祉。考虑到人口老龄化,人们呼吁制定旨在加强老年人福祉的社会政策。因此,就加强立陶宛老年人口福祉的可能方式向决策者提出了建议。这些建议是基于第七次欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的数据。在第七轮SHARE调查中,立陶宛有2014名50岁及以上的人接受了采访。对福利、健康、工作和经济状况、童年环境、歧视经历等各个方面的数据进行了分析。根据幸福感的不同方面,研究发现,受访者可以分为高、低和中等幸福感集群,此外,分析表明,与其他国家相比,立陶宛人口的幸福感相对较低。提出了针对慢性病、共病性精神健康障碍、工作、经济状况、童年环境和个人生活史可能采取的措施的建议。这些建议针对的是卫生、社会和就业、教育和科学政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信