Effect of Concurrent Training Order With Electromyostimulation on Physical Performance in Young Elderly Women

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION
Mehri Derakhshan Nejad, M. Nikbakht, M. Ghanbarzadeh, R. Ranjbar
{"title":"Effect of Concurrent Training Order With Electromyostimulation on Physical Performance in Young Elderly Women","authors":"Mehri Derakhshan Nejad, M. Nikbakht, M. Ghanbarzadeh, R. Ranjbar","doi":"10.32598/RJ.21.4.3147.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aging is one of the stages of life that needs special attention due to the special conditions of this period of life. Inactivity and myasthenia due to aging are important factors in reducing the physical and functional activities in the elderly, which can affect their quality of life. On the other hand, electromyostimulation (EMS) is one of the modern training methods that can be suitable for disabilities in the elderly. Also, the training sequence in concurrent training is one of the variables of training that can affect its adaptations. This study aimed to compare the effect of exercise sequence in concurrent training with EMS on the motor performance of elderly women. Materials & Methods: In this semi-experimental single-blinded study, 50 healthy elderly female volunteers, age range of 60-70 years, were selected by random sampling divided randomly into the following groups (each group of 10 people): Aerobic-resistance training with EMS, resistance-aerobic exercise with EMS, rotational exercise (change of priority periodically in training sessions) with EMS, and rotational and control (without training) groups. The training protocol consisted of twelve weeks of exercise, three sessions per week, and each session three stages of warm-up (10-15 minutes), main exercises (20 minutes) and cooling (10 minutes). The main training program consisted of 20 minutes of parallel combination exercises, which were two 10-minute steps with a 3-5 minute intervals. Aerobic exercises were performed with the intensity of 70%-50% of maximum oxygen consumption and resistance exercises using body weight and elastic bands for different muscle groups. The training schedule was the same for all groups in terms of volume and intensity, with the only difference being in the exercise sequence and EMS presentation. Strength of the upper and lower torso muscles were measured with chest press and seated leg extension, respectively, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) with a one-mile Rockport walking test, muscular endurance with a 2-minute marching on a spot-test and lower torso strength with a walking test on the slope in two stages before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using dependent t-tests and Covariance Analysis (ANCOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc test using SPSS software V. 22 and P≥0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant increase was observed in all measured dependent variables relative to the baseline values (P<0.001). In the study of intergroup changes, a significant increase was observed in VO2 max level, upper and lower torso strength, and muscular endurance in all of the intervention groups compared to the control group (P<0.001), but lower torso strength was significant only in the intervention groups with EMS compared to the control group (P<0.001). VO2 max changes and the lower torso strength in training groups with EMS were significantly higher than the groups without EMS (P<0.01). Also, the upper torso strength and the endurance of the lower torso muscles in the group with the priority of resistance training with EMS were higher than the combination group without EMS (P<0.01). Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be said that combined concurrent exercises are a useful method in promoting physical fitness and physical performance of elderly women, and the use of EMS can increase the effectiveness of adaptations resulting from exercise, especially lower torso strength in the elderly and can prevent complications associated with myasthenia. On the other hand, the training sequence with the priority of resistance training can be effective in increasing the effect of exercise on the variables of upper torso muscle strength and muscular endurance, but it does not have a significant effect on lower torso strength, cardiorespiratory endurance and lower torso strength.","PeriodicalId":43655,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Rehabilitation","volume":"12 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/RJ.21.4.3147.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Aging is one of the stages of life that needs special attention due to the special conditions of this period of life. Inactivity and myasthenia due to aging are important factors in reducing the physical and functional activities in the elderly, which can affect their quality of life. On the other hand, electromyostimulation (EMS) is one of the modern training methods that can be suitable for disabilities in the elderly. Also, the training sequence in concurrent training is one of the variables of training that can affect its adaptations. This study aimed to compare the effect of exercise sequence in concurrent training with EMS on the motor performance of elderly women. Materials & Methods: In this semi-experimental single-blinded study, 50 healthy elderly female volunteers, age range of 60-70 years, were selected by random sampling divided randomly into the following groups (each group of 10 people): Aerobic-resistance training with EMS, resistance-aerobic exercise with EMS, rotational exercise (change of priority periodically in training sessions) with EMS, and rotational and control (without training) groups. The training protocol consisted of twelve weeks of exercise, three sessions per week, and each session three stages of warm-up (10-15 minutes), main exercises (20 minutes) and cooling (10 minutes). The main training program consisted of 20 minutes of parallel combination exercises, which were two 10-minute steps with a 3-5 minute intervals. Aerobic exercises were performed with the intensity of 70%-50% of maximum oxygen consumption and resistance exercises using body weight and elastic bands for different muscle groups. The training schedule was the same for all groups in terms of volume and intensity, with the only difference being in the exercise sequence and EMS presentation. Strength of the upper and lower torso muscles were measured with chest press and seated leg extension, respectively, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) with a one-mile Rockport walking test, muscular endurance with a 2-minute marching on a spot-test and lower torso strength with a walking test on the slope in two stages before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using dependent t-tests and Covariance Analysis (ANCOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc test using SPSS software V. 22 and P≥0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant increase was observed in all measured dependent variables relative to the baseline values (P<0.001). In the study of intergroup changes, a significant increase was observed in VO2 max level, upper and lower torso strength, and muscular endurance in all of the intervention groups compared to the control group (P<0.001), but lower torso strength was significant only in the intervention groups with EMS compared to the control group (P<0.001). VO2 max changes and the lower torso strength in training groups with EMS were significantly higher than the groups without EMS (P<0.01). Also, the upper torso strength and the endurance of the lower torso muscles in the group with the priority of resistance training with EMS were higher than the combination group without EMS (P<0.01). Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be said that combined concurrent exercises are a useful method in promoting physical fitness and physical performance of elderly women, and the use of EMS can increase the effectiveness of adaptations resulting from exercise, especially lower torso strength in the elderly and can prevent complications associated with myasthenia. On the other hand, the training sequence with the priority of resistance training can be effective in increasing the effect of exercise on the variables of upper torso muscle strength and muscular endurance, but it does not have a significant effect on lower torso strength, cardiorespiratory endurance and lower torso strength.
同时训练顺序与肌电刺激对年轻老年女性运动表现的影响
目的:由于这一时期的特殊情况,衰老是需要特别关注的生命阶段之一。衰老导致的活动不足和肌无力是老年人身体和功能活动减少的重要因素,影响老年人的生活质量。另一方面,肌电刺激(EMS)是适合老年人残疾的现代训练方法之一。同时,并行训练中的训练顺序也是影响训练适应性的变量之一。本研究旨在比较同步训练中运动顺序与EMS对老年女性运动表现的影响。材料与方法:本研究采用半实验的单盲方法,随机抽取年龄在60-70岁的健康老年女性志愿者50名,随机分为有氧-阻力训练组、有氧-阻力训练组、旋转训练组(在训练中周期性改变优先级)和旋转对照组(不训练),每组10人。训练方案包括12周的锻炼,每周三次,每次三个阶段的热身(10-15分钟),主要练习(20分钟)和冷却(10分钟)。主要的训练计划包括20分钟的平行组合练习,这是两个10分钟的步骤,间隔3-5分钟。有氧运动强度为最大耗氧量的70%-50%,阻力运动采用体重和弹力带针对不同肌肉群进行。所有组的训练计划在量和强度方面都是相同的,唯一的区别是运动顺序和EMS呈现。在干预前后的两个阶段,分别通过胸部按压和坐姿伸腿来测量上半身和下半身肌肉的力量,通过一英里Rockport步行测试来测量最大耗氧量(VO2 max),通过2分钟步行测试来测量肌肉耐力,通过斜坡上步行测试来测量下半身力量。采用相关t检验和协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行统计学分析,采用SPSS软件进行Bonferroni事后检验,以P≥0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:与基线值相比,所有测量的因变量均显著增加(P<0.001)。在组间变化研究中,与对照组相比,所有干预组的最大摄氧量水平、上下躯干力量和肌肉耐力均显著增加(P<0.001),但只有EMS干预组的下躯干力量较对照组显著(P<0.001)。EMS组VO2 max变化和下肢力量显著高于未EMS组(P<0.01)。抗阻训练优先组的上肢力量和下肢肌肉耐力均高于不进行抗阻训练的组合组(P<0.01)。结论:综合以上结果,可以说联合并发运动是促进老年女性身体健康和体能表现的有效方法,EMS的使用可以提高运动产生的适应效果,特别是老年人下肢力量,可以预防肌无力相关并发症。另一方面,阻力训练优先的训练顺序可以有效地增加运动对上肢肌力和肌肉耐力等变量的影响,但对下肢肌力、心肺耐力和下肢肌力的影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Rehabilitation
Archives of Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信