4chumblr’s divorce: Revisiting the online culture wars through the 2014 Tumblr-4chan raids

IF 13.4 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Hagen
{"title":"4chumblr’s divorce: Revisiting the online culture wars through the 2014 Tumblr-4chan raids","authors":"S. Hagen","doi":"10.1177/13548565231190008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text concerns conflict between users of 4chan and Tumblr, two groups said to have formed a vanguard to the ‘online culture wars’ of the last decade. Specifically, I focus on a 2014 clash known as the ‘Tumblr-4chan raids’. Predating the more infamous Gamergate controversy, I see this event as a useful alternative microcosm to study polarisation among online subcultures in the mid-2010s. Drawing from subculture studies, I first theorise cross-site clashes as puncturing a sense of ‘subcultural territoriality’ whereby an online platform is appropriated as a secluded refuge. Through a quali-quantitative archival study, I find that the raids were initiated and exacerbated by trolling 4channers rather than a clash between equal sides. I ultimately argue that the feud partially arose out of 4channers’ reactionary ‘media ideologies’ on the Internet, wherein sensitivity, empathy, and care were seen as incongruous with ideas on the online as brutal and unforgiving. Next to better-known political clashes between feminists and anti-feminists, the paper thus highlights the polarising role of media ideologies at the onset of the ‘online culture wars’ in the mid-2010s.","PeriodicalId":712,"journal":{"name":"Nano Convergence","volume":"24 1","pages":"1283 - 1307"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nano Convergence","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231190008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This text concerns conflict between users of 4chan and Tumblr, two groups said to have formed a vanguard to the ‘online culture wars’ of the last decade. Specifically, I focus on a 2014 clash known as the ‘Tumblr-4chan raids’. Predating the more infamous Gamergate controversy, I see this event as a useful alternative microcosm to study polarisation among online subcultures in the mid-2010s. Drawing from subculture studies, I first theorise cross-site clashes as puncturing a sense of ‘subcultural territoriality’ whereby an online platform is appropriated as a secluded refuge. Through a quali-quantitative archival study, I find that the raids were initiated and exacerbated by trolling 4channers rather than a clash between equal sides. I ultimately argue that the feud partially arose out of 4channers’ reactionary ‘media ideologies’ on the Internet, wherein sensitivity, empathy, and care were seen as incongruous with ideas on the online as brutal and unforgiving. Next to better-known political clashes between feminists and anti-feminists, the paper thus highlights the polarising role of media ideologies at the onset of the ‘online culture wars’ in the mid-2010s.
tumblr的离婚:通过2014年对Tumblr-4chan的突袭,重新审视网络文化之战
这篇文章涉及4chan和Tumblr用户之间的冲突,据说这两个群体是过去十年“网络文化战争”的先锋。具体来说,我关注的是2014年被称为“Tumblr-4chan突袭”的冲突。在臭名昭著的Gamergate争议之前,我认为这一事件是研究2010年代中期在线亚文化两极分化的一个有用的微观世界。从亚文化研究中,我首先将跨站点冲突理论化为“亚文化地域性”,即在线平台被用作隐蔽的避难所。通过一项定性定量的档案研究,我发现,这些袭击是由网络攻击者发起并加剧的,而不是平等双方之间的冲突。我最终认为,这种争执部分源于4channers在互联网上反动的“媒体意识形态”,其中的敏感、同理心和关怀被视为与网络上残忍和无情的想法不协调。在女权主义者和反女权主义者之间众所周知的政治冲突之后,本文因此强调了媒体意识形态在2010年代中期“网络文化战争”开始时的两极分化作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nano Convergence
Nano Convergence Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Nano Convergence is an internationally recognized, peer-reviewed, and interdisciplinary journal designed to foster effective communication among scientists spanning diverse research areas closely aligned with nanoscience and nanotechnology. Dedicated to encouraging the convergence of technologies across the nano- to microscopic scale, the journal aims to unveil novel scientific domains and cultivate fresh research prospects. Operating on a single-blind peer-review system, Nano Convergence ensures transparency in the review process, with reviewers cognizant of authors' names and affiliations while maintaining anonymity in the feedback provided to authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信