Aerobic bacterial study of postoperative lower segment cesarean site wound infection

K. Pooja, M. Nagmoti
{"title":"Aerobic bacterial study of postoperative lower segment cesarean site wound infection","authors":"K. Pooja, M. Nagmoti","doi":"10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_106_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section wound infection illustrates a significant load to the health system as it carries an increased risk of infection as compared to normal vaginal delivery. Hence, it is necessary to identify the agents responsible as well as their extent of susceptibility for commonly used antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College. The specimens were inoculated on the blood and MacConkey agar. The colonies were identified by their morphological characteristics and the biochemical tests, antibiotic susceptibility test was carried for the isolated aerobic bacterial isolates. RESULTS: In the present study, Staphylococcus aureus (13, 56.68%) was the most common pathogen isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (5, 21.9%). Gram-positive isolates showed greater sensitivity to tetracycline 11 (73.33%), followed by doxycycline (11, 73.33%) and clindamycin (9, 60%). Gram-negative bacteria showed the highest sensitivity meropenem (7, 77.78%), imipenem (6, 66.66%), and piperacillin + tazobactam (6, 66.66%). CONCLUSION: Frequent antimicrobial audit and qualitative research could give an insight into the current antibiotic prescription practices and the factors governing the same.","PeriodicalId":13457,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_106_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section wound infection illustrates a significant load to the health system as it carries an increased risk of infection as compared to normal vaginal delivery. Hence, it is necessary to identify the agents responsible as well as their extent of susceptibility for commonly used antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College. The specimens were inoculated on the blood and MacConkey agar. The colonies were identified by their morphological characteristics and the biochemical tests, antibiotic susceptibility test was carried for the isolated aerobic bacterial isolates. RESULTS: In the present study, Staphylococcus aureus (13, 56.68%) was the most common pathogen isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (5, 21.9%). Gram-positive isolates showed greater sensitivity to tetracycline 11 (73.33%), followed by doxycycline (11, 73.33%) and clindamycin (9, 60%). Gram-negative bacteria showed the highest sensitivity meropenem (7, 77.78%), imipenem (6, 66.66%), and piperacillin + tazobactam (6, 66.66%). CONCLUSION: Frequent antimicrobial audit and qualitative research could give an insight into the current antibiotic prescription practices and the factors governing the same.
剖宫产术后下段切口感染的需氧细菌研究
剖宫产伤口感染给卫生系统带来了巨大的负担,因为与正常阴道分娩相比,它具有更高的感染风险。因此,有必要确定病原及其对常用抗生素的易感程度。材料与方法:本研究在贾瓦哈拉尔·尼赫鲁医学院微生物系进行。将标本接种于血液和麦康基琼脂上。对分离得到的好氧菌进行了菌落形态特征鉴定和生化试验,并进行了药敏试验。结果:本研究中分离到的病原菌以金黄色葡萄球菌(13株,占56.68%)最多,其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(5株,占21.9%)。革兰氏阳性菌株对四环素11的敏感性最高(73.33%),其次为强力霉素11(73.33%)和克林霉素9(60%)。革兰氏阴性菌对美罗培南(7株,77.78%)、亚胺培南(6株,66.66%)、哌西林+他唑巴坦(6株,66.66%)的敏感性最高。结论:频繁的抗菌药物审核和定性研究可以深入了解当前的抗生素处方实践及其影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信