What do High School Students Think About Co-Teaching in Science Classrooms?

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Shantha Preston-Smith, Margaret E. King‐Sears, A. Evmenova, P. Baker
{"title":"What do High School Students Think About Co-Teaching in Science Classrooms?","authors":"Shantha Preston-Smith, Margaret E. King‐Sears, A. Evmenova, P. Baker","doi":"10.18666/ldmj-2020-v25-i1-10107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For graduation, high school students with learning disabilities and other high-incidence disabilities need sufficient science credits. For many students, their success is dependent on how well they learn in co-taught classes. However, students seldom have a voice about co-teaching in science. In this study, high school students with and without learning disabilities and other high-incidence disabilities provided their perspectives about co-taught science classes. Disproportionate stratified random sampling was used to select students from 17 co-taught science classes. Ninety-nine students completed the Co-Teaching Student Questionnaire (CTSQ) about science co-teachers’ roles and level of agreement with statements about co-taught instruction. Additionally, students’ written responses about co-teaching benefits and suggestions for improvement were analyzed. Results indicated similarities and differences in perceptions from students with and without disabilities. More than half of all students accessed both co-teachers when they needed help, and almost all students agreed the teachers seemed comfortable sharing responsibilities when co-teaching. Students were divided about whether co-teachers distributed tasks evenly. A benefit noted in qualitative themes was having support and help from co-teachers, whereas an improvement was ensuring special educators had sufficient science content knowledge. Implications for practice and future research, including eliciting and using students’ perspectives, are presented. Subscribe to LDMJ","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"29-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2020-v25-i1-10107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

For graduation, high school students with learning disabilities and other high-incidence disabilities need sufficient science credits. For many students, their success is dependent on how well they learn in co-taught classes. However, students seldom have a voice about co-teaching in science. In this study, high school students with and without learning disabilities and other high-incidence disabilities provided their perspectives about co-taught science classes. Disproportionate stratified random sampling was used to select students from 17 co-taught science classes. Ninety-nine students completed the Co-Teaching Student Questionnaire (CTSQ) about science co-teachers’ roles and level of agreement with statements about co-taught instruction. Additionally, students’ written responses about co-teaching benefits and suggestions for improvement were analyzed. Results indicated similarities and differences in perceptions from students with and without disabilities. More than half of all students accessed both co-teachers when they needed help, and almost all students agreed the teachers seemed comfortable sharing responsibilities when co-teaching. Students were divided about whether co-teachers distributed tasks evenly. A benefit noted in qualitative themes was having support and help from co-teachers, whereas an improvement was ensuring special educators had sufficient science content knowledge. Implications for practice and future research, including eliciting and using students’ perspectives, are presented. Subscribe to LDMJ
高中生对科学课堂合作教学的看法?
为了毕业,有学习障碍和其他高发残疾的高中生需要足够的科学学分。对许多学生来说,他们的成功取决于他们在合作授课的课堂上学习得如何。然而,学生很少对科学合作教学发表意见。在本研究中,有和没有学习障碍和其他高发障碍的高中生提供了他们对共同教学科学课的看法。采用不成比例分层随机抽样的方法从17个共同授课的科学班中选择学生。99名学生完成了合作教学学生问卷(CTSQ),问卷内容涉及科学合作教师的角色和对合作教学陈述的认同程度。此外,我们还分析了学生关于合作教学的好处和改进建议的书面反馈。结果显示残疾学生和非残疾学生在认知上的异同。超过一半的学生在需要帮助的时候会向两位老师求助,几乎所有的学生都认为,在共同教学的时候,老师们似乎很乐意分担责任。学生们对共同老师是否平均分配任务存在分歧。在定性主题中指出的一个好处是得到了共同教师的支持和帮助,而一个改进是确保特殊教育者拥有足够的科学内容知识。提出了对实践和未来研究的启示,包括激发和使用学生的观点。订阅LDMJ
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信