Smoking cessation with counselling and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM): A randomized controlled trial

Sonia Baccetti , M. Valeria Monechi , Monica Da Frè , Tommaso Conti , Marina Faedda , Patrizia Panti , Claudia Bricci , Antonio Cecconi , Rosario Cutrí , Rosangela Terrone , Fabio Voller , Anna Braccini , Giovanna Franconi
{"title":"Smoking cessation with counselling and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM): A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Sonia Baccetti ,&nbsp;M. Valeria Monechi ,&nbsp;Monica Da Frè ,&nbsp;Tommaso Conti ,&nbsp;Marina Faedda ,&nbsp;Patrizia Panti ,&nbsp;Claudia Bricci ,&nbsp;Antonio Cecconi ,&nbsp;Rosario Cutrí ,&nbsp;Rosangela Terrone ,&nbsp;Fabio Voller ,&nbsp;Anna Braccini ,&nbsp;Giovanna Franconi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthe.2016.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Non pharmacologic interventions like counselling and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), have been shown to be effective for </span>smoking cessation. In the present study we wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of counselling in smoking cessation combined with true or sham TCM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>477 smokers (172 men and 305 women) were randomized into 3 groups: group A (sham TCM and counselling), group B (true TCM and counselling) and group C (true TCM). TCM intervention included pharmacopuncture, plum-blossom needling and auriculotherapy. The main outcome measures were the percentage of non-smokers and the Fagerstrom nicotine addiction score in those still smoking at the end of </span>treatment, and after 6 months and 1</span> <!-->year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><strong>A</strong>t the end of treatment, the percentage of non-smokers was: 57.1% in Group A, 59.1% in Group B, and 49.4% in Group C. After 1<!--> <!-->year, the percentage of non-smokers was significantly lower in group C (19.1%) than in groups A (30.1%) and B (32.7%) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.015). The Fagerstrom test in the subjects still smoking was not significantly different in the 3 groups <strong>a</strong>t the end of treatment and after 1<!--> <!-->year.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TCM could be an effective treatment for smoking cessation when used as a single technique and especially combined with counselling. Further studies are needed to determine its efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100022,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.arthe.2016.05.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211766016300032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Non pharmacologic interventions like counselling and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), have been shown to be effective for smoking cessation. In the present study we wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of counselling in smoking cessation combined with true or sham TCM.

Methods

477 smokers (172 men and 305 women) were randomized into 3 groups: group A (sham TCM and counselling), group B (true TCM and counselling) and group C (true TCM). TCM intervention included pharmacopuncture, plum-blossom needling and auriculotherapy. The main outcome measures were the percentage of non-smokers and the Fagerstrom nicotine addiction score in those still smoking at the end of treatment, and after 6 months and 1 year.

Results

At the end of treatment, the percentage of non-smokers was: 57.1% in Group A, 59.1% in Group B, and 49.4% in Group C. After 1 year, the percentage of non-smokers was significantly lower in group C (19.1%) than in groups A (30.1%) and B (32.7%) (p = 0.015). The Fagerstrom test in the subjects still smoking was not significantly different in the 3 groups at the end of treatment and after 1 year.

Conclusions

TCM could be an effective treatment for smoking cessation when used as a single technique and especially combined with counselling. Further studies are needed to determine its efficacy.

戒烟辅导与中药:一项随机对照试验
非药物干预,如咨询和中医(TCM),已被证明是有效的戒烟。在本研究中,我们想评估咨询与真或假中药联合戒烟的有效性。方法将477例吸烟者(男172例,女305例)随机分为3组:A组(假中药+咨询)、B组(真中药+咨询)和C组(真中药)。中医干预包括药物针刺、梅花针和耳穴疗法。主要结果测量是治疗结束时、6个月后和1年后仍在吸烟的患者中不吸烟者的百分比和Fagerstrom尼古丁成瘾评分。结果治疗结束时,A组不吸烟者比例为57.1%,B组为59.1%,C组为49.4%。1年后,C组不吸烟者比例(19.1%)显著低于A组(30.1%)和B组(32.7%)(p = 0.015)。在治疗结束和1年后,三组仍然吸烟的受试者的Fagerstrom测试没有显著差异。结论stcm作为一种单独的治疗方法,特别是与心理咨询相结合,是一种有效的戒烟治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信