Same-different letter decision task: a study with Spanish children with dyslexia (Tarea de decisión de letras igual-diferente: un estudio con niños españoles con dislexia)

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Cristina Martínez-García, F. Cuetos, Paz Suárez‐Coalla
{"title":"Same-different letter decision task: a study with Spanish children with dyslexia (Tarea de decisión de letras igual-diferente: un estudio con niños españoles con dislexia)","authors":"Cristina Martínez-García, F. Cuetos, Paz Suárez‐Coalla","doi":"10.1080/02103702.2022.2096298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is common to see mirror errors in letters in early stages of reading due to the mirror-generalization process that allows a visual stimulus to be identified independently of its orientation. To avoid such errors, this process must be inhibited. A special case would be children with dyslexia since their difficulties with the alphabetic code may also delay the acquisition of correct letter orientation. We investigated the relationship between reversible errors in reading and dyslexia. Twenty-seven Spanish-speaking children with dyslexia (7–12 years old) and 27 chronological-age-matched controls performed a ‘same-different’ letter decision task on reversible and non-reversible letters. Results showed that all participants required more time and committed more errors in discriminating reversible letters. In addition, worse execution was observed in the dyslexic group, which seems to indicate that this group is delayed in the acquisition of correct letter orientation. Therefore, our results indicated that overcoming reading errors in mirrors depends to some extent on the reading competence of the children and the ability to inhibit the process of generalization of mirrors.","PeriodicalId":51988,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"870 - 905"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2022.2096298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is common to see mirror errors in letters in early stages of reading due to the mirror-generalization process that allows a visual stimulus to be identified independently of its orientation. To avoid such errors, this process must be inhibited. A special case would be children with dyslexia since their difficulties with the alphabetic code may also delay the acquisition of correct letter orientation. We investigated the relationship between reversible errors in reading and dyslexia. Twenty-seven Spanish-speaking children with dyslexia (7–12 years old) and 27 chronological-age-matched controls performed a ‘same-different’ letter decision task on reversible and non-reversible letters. Results showed that all participants required more time and committed more errors in discriminating reversible letters. In addition, worse execution was observed in the dyslexic group, which seems to indicate that this group is delayed in the acquisition of correct letter orientation. Therefore, our results indicated that overcoming reading errors in mirrors depends to some extent on the reading competence of the children and the ability to inhibit the process of generalization of mirrors.
同样不同的字母决策任务:一项对西班牙诵读困难儿童的研究
在阅读的早期阶段,由于镜像泛化过程使视觉刺激独立于其方向而被识别,因此在字母中看到镜像错误是很常见的。为了避免这样的错误,这个过程必须被抑制。一个特殊的情况是患有阅读障碍的儿童,因为他们在字母编码方面的困难也可能延迟获得正确的字母方向。我们调查了阅读中可逆性错误和阅读障碍之间的关系。27名患有阅读障碍的西班牙语儿童(7-12岁)和27名时间年龄匹配的对照者对可逆和非可逆字母进行了“相同-不同”的字母决策任务。结果表明,所有参与者在区分可逆字母时都需要更多的时间和更多的错误。此外,在诵读困难组中观察到更差的执行,这似乎表明这一组在获得正确的字母方向方面延迟。因此,我们的研究结果表明,克服镜子阅读错误在一定程度上取决于儿童的阅读能力和抑制镜子泛化过程的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信