A Rapid Feedback App: Possibilities and Pitfalls for Extended Democracy

Mette Sønderskov, Anne Tortzen, Ulla Higdem
{"title":"A Rapid Feedback App: Possibilities and Pitfalls for Extended Democracy","authors":"Mette Sønderskov, Anne Tortzen, Ulla Higdem","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.v27i2.11368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a democratic deficit has called for new forms of e-participation to increase or deepen citizens’ political participation. A new solution for rapid feedback, GiMening, is undergoing development and implementation in Norway. This article contributes to the understanding of the implementation of quick-response tools by suggesting which key points of awareness must be considered to enhance associated possibilities and avoid pitfalls. The research questions under examination are: How do municipal political leadership, school leadership and youth perceive the need for extended digital citizen participation? What are their thoughts on the possibilities and pitfalls that GiMening may trigger during its implementation and use in different contexts? Research on digital engagement and political participation among Scandinavian youth is used to theorise about the concept of democratic innovation. The data material consists of semi-structured interviews with actors from five Norwegian municipalities. The main findings of the analysis show that the use of GiMening could lower the threshold for participation, lead to better-informed decisions, increase citizens’ level of trust and improve awareness of people’s opinions; however, there are pitfalls related to the risk that GiMening might be used only as a one-way information sharing tool or that decision-makers will not apply input data.","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v27i2.11368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, a democratic deficit has called for new forms of e-participation to increase or deepen citizens’ political participation. A new solution for rapid feedback, GiMening, is undergoing development and implementation in Norway. This article contributes to the understanding of the implementation of quick-response tools by suggesting which key points of awareness must be considered to enhance associated possibilities and avoid pitfalls. The research questions under examination are: How do municipal political leadership, school leadership and youth perceive the need for extended digital citizen participation? What are their thoughts on the possibilities and pitfalls that GiMening may trigger during its implementation and use in different contexts? Research on digital engagement and political participation among Scandinavian youth is used to theorise about the concept of democratic innovation. The data material consists of semi-structured interviews with actors from five Norwegian municipalities. The main findings of the analysis show that the use of GiMening could lower the threshold for participation, lead to better-informed decisions, increase citizens’ level of trust and improve awareness of people’s opinions; however, there are pitfalls related to the risk that GiMening might be used only as a one-way information sharing tool or that decision-makers will not apply input data.
快速反馈应用:扩展民主的可能性和陷阱
最近,民主赤字要求新的电子参与形式来增加或深化公民的政治参与。挪威正在开发和实施一种新的快速反馈解决方案GiMening。本文通过建议必须考虑哪些关键点来增强相关的可能性并避免陷阱,有助于理解快速响应工具的实现。研究的问题是:市政政治领导、学校领导和青年如何看待扩大数字公民参与的需要?他们对GiMening在不同环境中实施和使用过程中可能引发的可能性和陷阱有什么看法?对斯堪的纳维亚青年的数字参与和政治参与的研究被用来对民主创新的概念进行理论化。数据材料包括对挪威五个城市的演员进行的半结构化访谈。分析的主要结果表明,使用“吉明”可以降低参与门槛,提高决策的知情程度,增加公民的信任水平,提高对民意的认识;然而,存在与GiMening可能仅被用作单向信息共享工具或决策者不应用输入数据相关的风险陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信