The Evaluation of Ultraviolet A/Riboflavin Corneal Crosslinking on Keratoconic Patients with a Corneal Thickness Less than 400 μm: A 3-Year Follow-Up

Huankai Zhang, Zhi-wei Li, Jia Wang, Guoying Mu
{"title":"The Evaluation of Ultraviolet A/Riboflavin Corneal Crosslinking on Keratoconic Patients with a Corneal Thickness Less than 400 μm: A 3-Year Follow-Up","authors":"Huankai Zhang, Zhi-wei Li, Jia Wang, Guoying Mu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo evaluate the effect of ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal crosslinking (CXL) on keratoconic patients with a corneal thickness less than 400 μm. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective study, patients with keratoconus were divided into a thin cornea group with a corneal thickness (CT) less than 400 μm and a thick cornea group with a CT more than 400 μm. The patients in the thin and thick cornea groups were treated with a hypotonic or isotonic riboflavin solution before and during CXL. Corneal morphological parameters were evaluated before and after CXL during a 3-year follow-up. The data were analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA, t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test or Mann-Whitney U test. \n \n \nResults: \nAfter surgery, the maximum keratometry (Kmax) of the thin and thick cornea groups underwent a continuous decrease (F= 24.364, P<0.001; F=10.427, P=0.001). In the thin group, the Kmax value was 60.51±6.11 diopters (D) before surgery and significantly decreased to 57.43±6.82 D, 56.13±6.85 D and 54.97±6.66 D at 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery (t=3.670, P=0.002; t=4.637, P<0.001; t=5.816, P<0.001). In the thick group, the Kmax value was 54.56±6.27 D before surgery and significantly decreased to 53.25±6.42 D, 52.32±6.47 D and 51.58±6.70 D at 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery (t=2.266, P=0.040; t=3.302, P=0.005; t=3.769, P=0.002). The Kmax value of the thin cornea group before surgery was higher than that of the thick cornea group (t=2.714, P=0.011). There were no significant differences in Kmax between the two groups at 1 year, 2 years or 3 years. In the thin group, there were significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (Z=-2.716, P=0.007; Z=-3.063, P=0.002; t=4.468, P<0.001). In the thick group, there were significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative UCVA, BCVA and TCT (t=3.572, P=0.003; Z=-2.956, P=0.003; Z=-3.410, P=0.001). In the two groups, there were no significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) or endothelial cell density (ECD). There were no significant differences in pre- or postoperative UCVA, BCVA, IOP, or ECD between the two groups. There were significiant differences in pre- and postoperative TCT between the two groups (Z=-4.816, P=0.001; Z=-4.024, P<0.001). \n \n \nConclusion: \nCXL is an effective and safe way to halt disease progression and improve visual acuity in keratoconic patients with a CT less than 400 μm. \n \n \nKey words: \nkeratoconus; ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal crosslinking; hypotonic riboflavin solution; isotonic riboflavin solution; corneal thickness","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"113 1","pages":"801-806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal crosslinking (CXL) on keratoconic patients with a corneal thickness less than 400 μm. Methods: In this prospective study, patients with keratoconus were divided into a thin cornea group with a corneal thickness (CT) less than 400 μm and a thick cornea group with a CT more than 400 μm. The patients in the thin and thick cornea groups were treated with a hypotonic or isotonic riboflavin solution before and during CXL. Corneal morphological parameters were evaluated before and after CXL during a 3-year follow-up. The data were analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA, t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: After surgery, the maximum keratometry (Kmax) of the thin and thick cornea groups underwent a continuous decrease (F= 24.364, P<0.001; F=10.427, P=0.001). In the thin group, the Kmax value was 60.51±6.11 diopters (D) before surgery and significantly decreased to 57.43±6.82 D, 56.13±6.85 D and 54.97±6.66 D at 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery (t=3.670, P=0.002; t=4.637, P<0.001; t=5.816, P<0.001). In the thick group, the Kmax value was 54.56±6.27 D before surgery and significantly decreased to 53.25±6.42 D, 52.32±6.47 D and 51.58±6.70 D at 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery (t=2.266, P=0.040; t=3.302, P=0.005; t=3.769, P=0.002). The Kmax value of the thin cornea group before surgery was higher than that of the thick cornea group (t=2.714, P=0.011). There were no significant differences in Kmax between the two groups at 1 year, 2 years or 3 years. In the thin group, there were significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (Z=-2.716, P=0.007; Z=-3.063, P=0.002; t=4.468, P<0.001). In the thick group, there were significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative UCVA, BCVA and TCT (t=3.572, P=0.003; Z=-2.956, P=0.003; Z=-3.410, P=0.001). In the two groups, there were no significant differences between the preoperative and 3-year postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) or endothelial cell density (ECD). There were no significant differences in pre- or postoperative UCVA, BCVA, IOP, or ECD between the two groups. There were significiant differences in pre- and postoperative TCT between the two groups (Z=-4.816, P=0.001; Z=-4.024, P<0.001). Conclusion: CXL is an effective and safe way to halt disease progression and improve visual acuity in keratoconic patients with a CT less than 400 μm. Key words: keratoconus; ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal crosslinking; hypotonic riboflavin solution; isotonic riboflavin solution; corneal thickness
紫外线A/核黄素角膜交联治疗角膜厚度小于400 μm的角膜锥形患者:3年随访
目的:探讨紫外线A/核黄素角膜交联(CXL)治疗角膜厚度小于400 μm角膜屈曲症的疗效。方法:本前瞻性研究将圆锥角膜患者分为角膜厚度小于400 μm的薄角膜组和CT大于400 μm的厚角膜组。薄角膜组和厚角膜组分别在角膜移植前和手术中给予低渗或等渗核黄素溶液。在3年随访期间,评估角膜形态参数在CXL前后。资料分析采用重复测量方差分析、t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:术后薄、厚角膜组最大角膜密度(Kmax)持续下降(F= 24.364, P<0.001;F = 10.427, P = 0.001)。瘦组术前Kmax值为60.51±6.11屈光度(D),术后1、2、3年Kmax值分别为57.43±6.82 D、56.13±6.85 D和54.97±6.66 D,差异有统计学意义(t=3.670, P=0.002;t = 4.637, P < 0.001;t = 5.816, P < 0.001)。厚组术前Kmax值为54.56±6.27 D,术后1、2、3年Kmax值分别为53.25±6.42 D、52.32±6.47 D、51.58±6.70 D,差异有统计学意义(t=2.266, P=0.040;t = 3.302, P = 0.005;t = 3.769, P = 0.002)。薄角膜组术前Kmax值高于厚角膜组(t=2.714, P=0.011)。两组患者在1年、2年和3年的Kmax差异无统计学意义。瘦组术前与术后3年视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、最薄角膜厚度(TCT)差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.716, P=0.007;Z = -3.063, P = 0.002;t = 4.468, P < 0.001)。厚组术前与术后3年UCVA、BCVA、TCT差异有统计学意义(t=3.572, P=0.003;Z = -2.956, P = 0.003;Z = -3.410, P = 0.001)。两组术前和术后3年眼压(IOP)和内皮细胞密度(ECD)无显著差异。两组患者术前和术后UCVA、BCVA、IOP、ECD均无显著差异。两组术前和术后TCT比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.816, P=0.001;Z = -4.024, P < 0.001)。结论:对于CT小于400 μm的角膜锥形患者,CXL是一种安全有效的治疗方法。关键词:圆锥角膜;紫外线A/核黄素角膜交联;低渗核黄素溶液;等渗核黄素溶液;角膜厚度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信