21ST-CENTURY LEARNING: UNDERSTANDING THE LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES WITH TECHNOLOGY LITERACY AMONG L2 LEARNERS

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Z. Ali
{"title":"21ST-CENTURY LEARNING: UNDERSTANDING THE LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES WITH TECHNOLOGY LITERACY AMONG L2 LEARNERS","authors":"Z. Ali","doi":"10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp202-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: The study concerns investigating the learning of English in the 21st-century when digital learning platforms were used in assigning writing activities to students. Specifically, the use of the media was related to the Language Learning Strategies (LLS), namely metacognitive, cognitive, and social strategies classified by O'Malley et al. (1985) with the learning in the 21st-century.  \n  \nMethodology: The study employed a qualitative research design to collect responses from 72 engineering students studying at a technical university on the East Coast of Malaysia. An open-ended questionnaire was used to collect the responses from the participants and was validated by the researcher's colleague. Reliability was also taken care of in that verbatim reporting was observed in writing the current study's findings. Data were analysed using codes and themes formulated before they were reported.  \n  \nFindings: The study found that students used metacognitive strategies to check their language in the writing tasks. It was evident that Grammarly, Quillbot, and Google translate, to name a few, were used to check their writing. It was also reported that they linked new information to visual concepts in terms of cognitive strategies. Specifically, they used deduction methods to ensure they understood the sentences they composed. For social strategy, digital platforms, namely WhatsApp, Google Meet, and Discord, were among the common platforms used by the students. The study confirmed that the students demonstrated strong technology literacy as they could use multi-digital platforms to complete the writing tasks. \n  \nContributions: The study identifies the LLS employed by English as a Second Language (ESL) learners in 21st-century-learning. Also, it contributes to providing techniques that English practitioners can use in their writing classes. \n  \nKeywords: 21st-century learning, Language Learning Strategies (LLS), technology literacy. \n  \nCite as: Ali, Z. (2022). 21st-century learning: Understanding the language learning strategies with technology literacy among L2 learners.  Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 202-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp202-220","PeriodicalId":16687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp202-220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The study concerns investigating the learning of English in the 21st-century when digital learning platforms were used in assigning writing activities to students. Specifically, the use of the media was related to the Language Learning Strategies (LLS), namely metacognitive, cognitive, and social strategies classified by O'Malley et al. (1985) with the learning in the 21st-century.    Methodology: The study employed a qualitative research design to collect responses from 72 engineering students studying at a technical university on the East Coast of Malaysia. An open-ended questionnaire was used to collect the responses from the participants and was validated by the researcher's colleague. Reliability was also taken care of in that verbatim reporting was observed in writing the current study's findings. Data were analysed using codes and themes formulated before they were reported.    Findings: The study found that students used metacognitive strategies to check their language in the writing tasks. It was evident that Grammarly, Quillbot, and Google translate, to name a few, were used to check their writing. It was also reported that they linked new information to visual concepts in terms of cognitive strategies. Specifically, they used deduction methods to ensure they understood the sentences they composed. For social strategy, digital platforms, namely WhatsApp, Google Meet, and Discord, were among the common platforms used by the students. The study confirmed that the students demonstrated strong technology literacy as they could use multi-digital platforms to complete the writing tasks.   Contributions: The study identifies the LLS employed by English as a Second Language (ESL) learners in 21st-century-learning. Also, it contributes to providing techniques that English practitioners can use in their writing classes.   Keywords: 21st-century learning, Language Learning Strategies (LLS), technology literacy.   Cite as: Ali, Z. (2022). 21st-century learning: Understanding the language learning strategies with technology literacy among L2 learners.  Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 202-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp202-220
21世纪学习:了解第二语言学习者的语言学习策略与技术素养
背景和目的:本研究涉及调查21世纪的英语学习,当数字学习平台被用于分配给学生的写作活动时。具体来说,媒体的使用与语言学习策略(LLS)有关,即O'Malley等人(1985)根据21世纪的学习分类的元认知策略、认知策略和社会策略。方法:本研究采用定性研究设计,收集了马来西亚东海岸一所理工大学72名工科学生的反馈。使用开放式问卷收集参与者的回答,并由研究人员的同事进行验证。本研究结果的书面逐字报告也注意到可靠性。使用报告前制定的代码和主题对数据进行了分析。研究发现:学生在写作任务中使用元认知策略来检查自己的语言。很明显,Grammarly, Quillbot和谷歌translate,仅举几例,被用来检查他们的写作。据报道,他们在认知策略方面将新信息与视觉概念联系起来。具体来说,他们使用推理方法来确保他们理解他们所组成的句子。在社交策略方面,学生们常用的数字平台包括WhatsApp、谷歌Meet和Discord。该研究证实,学生们表现出很强的技术素养,因为他们可以使用多种数字平台来完成写作任务。贡献:本研究确定了英语作为第二语言(ESL)学习者在21世纪学习中使用的LLS。此外,它有助于提供英语从业者可以在写作课上使用的技巧。关键词:21世纪学习,语言学习策略,技术素养引用自:Ali, Z.(2022)。21世纪学习:了解第二语言学习者的技术素养和语言学习策略。自然科学学报,7(2),202-220。http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp202-220
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信