Comparing PCR With High-resolution Melting Analysis for Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in Alzheimer's: A Case-control Study.

Sara Pourshaikhali, Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari, Kolsoum Saeidi, Mehrsa Fekri Soofiabadi
{"title":"Comparing PCR With High-resolution Melting Analysis for Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in Alzheimer's: A Case-control Study.","authors":"Sara Pourshaikhali, Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari, Kolsoum Saeidi, Mehrsa Fekri Soofiabadi","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.206.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) genotype has a heterogeneous distribution throughout the world. The present study aimed to characterize the <i>APOE</i> genotype (<i>rs429358</i>, <i>rs7412</i>) in healthy individuals compared with Alzheimer cases in Kerman, southeastern Iran, by two standard mutation scanning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-control study, 90 Alzheimer patients as a case group and 90 healthy individuals as a control group were examined. <i>APOE</i> genotyping was carried out using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis assay and multiplex tetra-primer amplification-refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS PCR) techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to Multiplex T-ARMS PCR, HRM analysis was not efficient in rs7412 genotyping. The results of multiplex T-ARMS showed that <i>ɛ2ɛ3</i> genotype (P=0.006, odd ratio [OR]=0.119) and <i>ɛ2</i> allele (P=0.004, OR=0.129) were more prevalent in the control group compared with the case ones, whereas <i>ɛ4</i> allele was associated with borderline risk of Alzheimer disease (P=0.099, OR=1.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that Multiplex T-ARMS PCR could be considered as a better option than HRM analysis for <i>APOE</i> genotyping in terms of speed, accuracy, simplicity, and cheapness in large-scale use. Also, the present study revealed that <i>ɛ2 ɛ3</i> genotype and <i>ɛ2</i> allele are protective against Alzheimer whereas the <i>ɛ4</i> allele cannot be strongly considered as Alzheimer genetic risk factor in Kerman, Iran. The results may help to choose a better technique for <i>APOE</i> genotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":8728,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.206.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype has a heterogeneous distribution throughout the world. The present study aimed to characterize the APOE genotype (rs429358, rs7412) in healthy individuals compared with Alzheimer cases in Kerman, southeastern Iran, by two standard mutation scanning methods.

Methods: In this case-control study, 90 Alzheimer patients as a case group and 90 healthy individuals as a control group were examined. APOE genotyping was carried out using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis assay and multiplex tetra-primer amplification-refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS PCR) techniques.

Results: In contrast to Multiplex T-ARMS PCR, HRM analysis was not efficient in rs7412 genotyping. The results of multiplex T-ARMS showed that ɛ2ɛ3 genotype (P=0.006, odd ratio [OR]=0.119) and ɛ2 allele (P=0.004, OR=0.129) were more prevalent in the control group compared with the case ones, whereas ɛ4 allele was associated with borderline risk of Alzheimer disease (P=0.099, OR=1.76).

Conclusion: We concluded that Multiplex T-ARMS PCR could be considered as a better option than HRM analysis for APOE genotyping in terms of speed, accuracy, simplicity, and cheapness in large-scale use. Also, the present study revealed that ɛ2 ɛ3 genotype and ɛ2 allele are protective against Alzheimer whereas the ɛ4 allele cannot be strongly considered as Alzheimer genetic risk factor in Kerman, Iran. The results may help to choose a better technique for APOE genotyping.

比较 PCR 与高分辨率熔融分析在阿尔茨海默氏症载脂蛋白 E 基因分型中的应用:病例对照研究。
介绍:载脂蛋白 E(APOE)基因型在全世界的分布各不相同。本研究旨在通过两种标准突变扫描方法,对伊朗东南部克尔曼地区健康人与阿尔茨海默病病例的 APOE 基因型(rs429358、rs7412)进行比较:在这项病例对照研究中,90 名阿尔茨海默病患者作为病例组,90 名健康人作为对照组。采用高分辨率熔解(HRM)分析测定法和多重四引物扩增-难辨突变系统聚合酶链反应(T-ARMS PCR)技术进行 APOE 基因分型:结果:与多重 T-ARMS PCR 相比,HRM 分析在 rs7412 基因分型中并不有效。多重T-ARMS结果显示,与病例组相比,对照组中ɛ2ɛ3基因型(P=0.006,奇数比[OR]=0.119)和ɛ2等位基因(P=0.004,OR=0.129)更普遍,而ɛ4等位基因与阿尔茨海默病的边缘风险相关(P=0.099,OR=1.76):我们得出的结论是,在大规模应用中,多重 T-ARMS PCR 在速度、准确性、简便性和廉价性方面均优于 HRM 分析,可被视为 APOE 基因分型的更好选择。此外,本研究还发现,在伊朗克尔曼,ɛ2 ɛ3基因型和ɛ2等位基因对阿尔茨海默氏症具有保护作用,而ɛ4等位基因不能被认为是阿尔茨海默氏症的遗传风险因素。这些结果可能有助于选择更好的 APOE 基因分型技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信