Virtual channels vs. multiple physical networks: A comparative analysis

Young-Jin Yoon, Nicola Concer, M. Petracca, L. Carloni
{"title":"Virtual channels vs. multiple physical networks: A comparative analysis","authors":"Young-Jin Yoon, Nicola Concer, M. Petracca, L. Carloni","doi":"10.1145/1837274.1837315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Packet-switched networks-on-chip (NoC) have been proposed as an efficient communication infrastructure for multi-core architectures. Adding virtual channels to a NoC helps to avoid deadlock and optimize the bandwidth of the physical channels in exchange for a more complex design of the routers. Another, possibly alternative, approach is to build multiple parallel physical networks (multi-planes) with smaller channels and simpler router organizations. We present a comparative analysis of these two approaches based on analytical models and on a comprehensive set of experimental results including both synthesized hardware implementations and system-level simulations.","PeriodicalId":87346,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","volume":"295 1","pages":"162-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

Packet-switched networks-on-chip (NoC) have been proposed as an efficient communication infrastructure for multi-core architectures. Adding virtual channels to a NoC helps to avoid deadlock and optimize the bandwidth of the physical channels in exchange for a more complex design of the routers. Another, possibly alternative, approach is to build multiple parallel physical networks (multi-planes) with smaller channels and simpler router organizations. We present a comparative analysis of these two approaches based on analytical models and on a comprehensive set of experimental results including both synthesized hardware implementations and system-level simulations.
虚拟通道与多个物理网络:比较分析
片上分组交换网络(NoC)作为一种高效的多核架构通信基础设施被提出。将虚拟通道添加到NoC有助于避免死锁并优化物理通道的带宽,以换取更复杂的路由器设计。另一种可能的替代方法是用更小的通道和更简单的路由器组织构建多个并行物理网络(多平面)。我们基于分析模型和一组综合的实验结果,包括综合硬件实现和系统级仿真,对这两种方法进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信