{"title":"Progressives in present and past","authors":"Ghazaleh Vafaeian","doi":"10.1075/sl.20009.vaf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the relationship between progressive patterns and present and past time reference. First,\n it looks at the shared distribution of more than 90 progressives in two parallel corpora and discusses the characteristics of\n these contexts. It is shown that while progressives are used for dramatic and topical events in the present, they are typically\n used as backgrounding, supportive material in the past. Second, it is shown that progressives generally have more occurrences in\n contexts with present time reference than past, this is especially true for progressives with many uses, i.e. more grammaticalized\n progressives. And third, a number of progressives temporally restricted are presented. Two historical explanations for these\n restrictions are provided, both of which result from the higher frequency of present uses over past.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20009.vaf","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between progressive patterns and present and past time reference. First,
it looks at the shared distribution of more than 90 progressives in two parallel corpora and discusses the characteristics of
these contexts. It is shown that while progressives are used for dramatic and topical events in the present, they are typically
used as backgrounding, supportive material in the past. Second, it is shown that progressives generally have more occurrences in
contexts with present time reference than past, this is especially true for progressives with many uses, i.e. more grammaticalized
progressives. And third, a number of progressives temporally restricted are presented. Two historical explanations for these
restrictions are provided, both of which result from the higher frequency of present uses over past.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.