Evaluation of Giomer Pit and Fissure Sealant as Compared to Resin Based One

Esraa Ibrahim, Samy Albaioumy, M. Mostafa
{"title":"Evaluation of Giomer Pit and Fissure Sealant as Compared to Resin Based One","authors":"Esraa Ibrahim, Samy Albaioumy, M. Mostafa","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.25809.1243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This study aimed to compare the antibacterial effect and microleakage of two types of fissure sealants; Beautisealant and Embrace wet Bond. Materials and Methods : for evaluation of the antibacterial effect, 30 saliva samples were obtained and were sent to microbiology laboratory where streptococcus mutans were isolated and the antibacterial effect of both materials was detected by the agar diffusion method. For microleakage test 30 extracted sound permanent molars were obtained. Two groups were formed (Group A &Group B) 15 teeth each. Teeth in group A were sealed with Embrace wet bond while Beautisealant was used to seal teeth in group B. Dye penetration was performed then specimens were put for 24 hours in 2% buffered methylene blue dye. Resin blocks were prepared then longitudinally sectioned buccolingually, The specimens were assessed for dye penetration with digital microscope. Results : For antibacterial effect it was found that Embrace wet Bond recorded higher bacterial inhibition zone than Beautisealant. Mann-Whitney-test (P=<0.0001< 0.05) was used to determine the difference between both groups and showed statistical significance. For the microleakage test it was found that Beautisealant recorded higher value of leakage than Embrace wet Bond. The difference between both groups showed statistical non-significance as determined by Mann-Whitney-test (P=0.4> 0.05). Conclusion : Embrace wet bond pit and fissure sealant could be better option than Beautisealant regarding the antibacterial effect however no difference was noticed between them regarding the microleakage.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.25809.1243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : This study aimed to compare the antibacterial effect and microleakage of two types of fissure sealants; Beautisealant and Embrace wet Bond. Materials and Methods : for evaluation of the antibacterial effect, 30 saliva samples were obtained and were sent to microbiology laboratory where streptococcus mutans were isolated and the antibacterial effect of both materials was detected by the agar diffusion method. For microleakage test 30 extracted sound permanent molars were obtained. Two groups were formed (Group A &Group B) 15 teeth each. Teeth in group A were sealed with Embrace wet bond while Beautisealant was used to seal teeth in group B. Dye penetration was performed then specimens were put for 24 hours in 2% buffered methylene blue dye. Resin blocks were prepared then longitudinally sectioned buccolingually, The specimens were assessed for dye penetration with digital microscope. Results : For antibacterial effect it was found that Embrace wet Bond recorded higher bacterial inhibition zone than Beautisealant. Mann-Whitney-test (P=<0.0001< 0.05) was used to determine the difference between both groups and showed statistical significance. For the microleakage test it was found that Beautisealant recorded higher value of leakage than Embrace wet Bond. The difference between both groups showed statistical non-significance as determined by Mann-Whitney-test (P=0.4> 0.05). Conclusion : Embrace wet bond pit and fissure sealant could be better option than Beautisealant regarding the antibacterial effect however no difference was noticed between them regarding the microleakage.
异构体坑缝密封胶与树脂基密封胶的比较
目的:比较两种裂隙封闭剂的抗菌效果和微渗漏情况;美丽密封胶和拥抱湿粘合。材料与方法:为评价抗菌效果,取30份唾液样本送微生物实验室分离变形链球菌,采用琼脂扩散法检测两种材料的抗菌效果。进行微漏试验,取出30颗正常恒磨牙。两组(A组和B组)各15颗牙。A组用Embrace湿粘接剂封闭牙体,b组用Beautisealant封闭牙体。染色渗透后用2%缓冲亚甲蓝染料浸泡24小时。制备树脂块,经口腔纵向切片,用数码显微镜观察染色渗透情况。结果:在抗菌效果方面,Embrace wet Bond比Beautisealant有更高的抑菌区。mann - whitney检验(P= 0.05)。结论:在抗菌效果上,采用拥抱湿键窝和裂隙密封剂优于美妆密封剂,但在微渗漏方面两者无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信