How Do Women’s Attitudes Towards Heterosexual Men Differ By Their Sexual Orientation? A Test of Competing Hypotheses

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Kruk, Jes L. Matsick
{"title":"How Do Women’s Attitudes Towards Heterosexual Men Differ By Their Sexual Orientation? A Test of Competing Hypotheses","authors":"M. Kruk, Jes L. Matsick","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2021.1929423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Though feminist theory asserts that women’s sexuality influences their general relationship with heterosexual men, the leading psychological measure of women’s attitudes towards heterosexual men, the Ambivalence towards Men Inventory (AMI), has not yet accounted for sexual orientation as a meaningful individual difference. In this current United States-based research (N = 318), we revisited the AMI to examine women’s attitudes towards heterosexual men as a function of women’s sexual orientation (i.e. lesbian, bisexual, or heterosexual). Drawing from feminist and psychological theories of attitudes towards men, we 1) tested competing hypotheses regarding whether lesbian and bisexual women or heterosexual women would be highest in hostility, and 2) hypothesised that heterosexual women would hold more benevolent attitudes than lesbian and bisexual women. When controlling for feminist identity, lesbian women held more hostile attitudes towards heterosexual men, specifically on subscales of Resentment of Paternalism and Heterosexual Hostility. However, there were no differences in benevolence towards heterosexual men between groups. We discuss hostility as a reaction to gendered oppression and the utility of benevolence in modern times. Testing the AMI with a sexually diverse sample reveals nuanced understandings of intergroup relations and demonstrates a need to establish more inclusive measures of gendered attitudes.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"25 1","pages":"774 - 784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1929423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Though feminist theory asserts that women’s sexuality influences their general relationship with heterosexual men, the leading psychological measure of women’s attitudes towards heterosexual men, the Ambivalence towards Men Inventory (AMI), has not yet accounted for sexual orientation as a meaningful individual difference. In this current United States-based research (N = 318), we revisited the AMI to examine women’s attitudes towards heterosexual men as a function of women’s sexual orientation (i.e. lesbian, bisexual, or heterosexual). Drawing from feminist and psychological theories of attitudes towards men, we 1) tested competing hypotheses regarding whether lesbian and bisexual women or heterosexual women would be highest in hostility, and 2) hypothesised that heterosexual women would hold more benevolent attitudes than lesbian and bisexual women. When controlling for feminist identity, lesbian women held more hostile attitudes towards heterosexual men, specifically on subscales of Resentment of Paternalism and Heterosexual Hostility. However, there were no differences in benevolence towards heterosexual men between groups. We discuss hostility as a reaction to gendered oppression and the utility of benevolence in modern times. Testing the AMI with a sexually diverse sample reveals nuanced understandings of intergroup relations and demonstrates a need to establish more inclusive measures of gendered attitudes.
女性对异性恋男性的态度因性取向不同而有何不同?竞争性假设的检验
虽然女权主义理论认为女性的性取向影响她们与异性恋男性的一般关系,但女性对异性恋男性态度的主要心理测量——对男性的矛盾心理量表(AMI)——尚未将性取向作为有意义的个体差异来考虑。在当前美国的研究中(N = 318),我们重新审视了AMI,以检验女性对异性恋男性的态度作为女性性取向(即女同性恋、双性恋或异性恋)的函数。根据女权主义和心理学对男性态度的理论,我们1)测试了关于女同性恋和双性恋女性或异性恋女性是否最具敌意的相互竞争的假设,2)假设异性恋女性比女同性恋和双性恋女性持有更仁慈的态度。在控制女权主义身份的情况下,女同性恋女性对异性恋男性的敌意态度更强,尤其是在“父权主义怨恨”和“异性恋敌意”两个分量表上。然而,不同群体对异性恋男性的仁慈程度没有差异。我们讨论敌意作为对性别压迫的反应和仁慈在现代的效用。用性别多样化的样本测试AMI揭示了对群体间关系的细微理解,并表明需要建立更具包容性的性别态度措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信