Comparison of efficacy of oral and topical route of tranexamic acid in patients of melasma

M. Devi, K. Saxena, Swosti Mohanty, G. Choudhary
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy of oral and topical route of tranexamic acid in patients of melasma","authors":"M. Devi, K. Saxena, Swosti Mohanty, G. Choudhary","doi":"10.18203/issn.2455-4529.intjresdermatol20232535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Melasma is a common pigmentary disorder which presents with brown coloured macules that occurs around the sun-exposed areas of the skin, particularly on the face. Many treatment modalities are present but often it is resistant to treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administered by oral and topical route in patients of melasma.\nMethods: Our study was a prospective, randomised study which consisted of 40 new melasma patients. 20 patients were given Oral Tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily, classified as Group 1, other 20 patients were given topical Tranexamic acid (3%) twice a day (fully covering the lesion), classified as Group 2 for a period of 8 weeks and both were given broad spectrum sunscreen (SPF 50). MASI was determined before starting treatment (baseline), 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Based on the reduction in the mean MASI, the therapeutic response is graded and subjective response and adverse effects were also recorded at each visit.\nResults: Mean percentage reduction in MASI scores was higher in oral (52.1%) as compared to topical (31.9%) group. In oral group, headache was the only adverse effect, however, in topical group, erythema, burning, acneiform eruptions were reported. At final assessment, fair improvement was seen in both groups.\nConclusions: Both oral as well as topical tranexamic acid were efficacious for treatment of melasma, however, of the two oral tranexamic acid was safer and provided a better proportional response.","PeriodicalId":14331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Dermatology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.intjresdermatol20232535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a common pigmentary disorder which presents with brown coloured macules that occurs around the sun-exposed areas of the skin, particularly on the face. Many treatment modalities are present but often it is resistant to treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administered by oral and topical route in patients of melasma. Methods: Our study was a prospective, randomised study which consisted of 40 new melasma patients. 20 patients were given Oral Tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily, classified as Group 1, other 20 patients were given topical Tranexamic acid (3%) twice a day (fully covering the lesion), classified as Group 2 for a period of 8 weeks and both were given broad spectrum sunscreen (SPF 50). MASI was determined before starting treatment (baseline), 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Based on the reduction in the mean MASI, the therapeutic response is graded and subjective response and adverse effects were also recorded at each visit. Results: Mean percentage reduction in MASI scores was higher in oral (52.1%) as compared to topical (31.9%) group. In oral group, headache was the only adverse effect, however, in topical group, erythema, burning, acneiform eruptions were reported. At final assessment, fair improvement was seen in both groups. Conclusions: Both oral as well as topical tranexamic acid were efficacious for treatment of melasma, however, of the two oral tranexamic acid was safer and provided a better proportional response.
口服与外用氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的疗效比较
背景:黄褐斑是一种常见的色素紊乱,表现为棕色斑点,发生在皮肤暴露在阳光下的区域,特别是在面部。目前有许多治疗方法,但通常对治疗有抗药性。本研究的目的是比较口服和外用氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑患者的疗效和安全性。方法:我们的研究是一项前瞻性,随机研究,包括40例新发黄褐斑患者。20例患者给予口服氨甲环酸250 mg,每日2次,作为第1组,另外20例患者给予氨甲环酸(3%),每日2次(完全覆盖病灶),作为第2组,疗程8周,均给予广谱防晒霜(SPF 50)。在开始治疗前(基线)、4周和8周测定MASI。根据平均MASI的减少,对治疗反应进行分级,并在每次就诊时记录主观反应和不良反应。结果:口腔组MASI评分的平均下降百分比(52.1%)高于局部组(31.9%)。在口服组中,头痛是唯一的不良反应,而在外用组中,有红斑,灼烧,痤疮样皮疹的报道。在最终评估中,两组患者均有明显改善。结论:口服和外用氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑均有效,但口服氨甲环酸更安全,比例反应更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信