United States Solar Investment: A Feasibility Study of Solar Farms in Kentucky

IF 0.9 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Youngil Kim, Allie Skaggs, James Ferrell
{"title":"United States Solar Investment: A Feasibility Study of Solar Farms in Kentucky","authors":"Youngil Kim, Allie Skaggs, James Ferrell","doi":"10.3390/solar2040028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States is experiencing a large growth in the solar sector. The U.S. solar power capacity has grown from 0.34 Gigawatts (GW) in 2008 to an estimated 97.2 GW today. However, some states have had difficulty installing large scale solar farms due to concerns regarding geographic location, political climate, or economic factors. Kentucky (KY) is one of the states which is below the national average for solar energy production. However, KY contains a wealth of potential for these types of farms with decent solar irradiation levels and large tracts of unused land for solar farms. For the study, this paper selects three representative areas of KY by using PVWatts and topographical maps which can theoretically produce enough electricity so that KY can meet or exceed the national generation percentage average (2.3% or 2.06 TWh annually in KY’s case). The study analyzes the economic feasibility of solar photovoltaic systems (PV) farms in terms of Cumulative Cash Flow ($) and Payback Time (Year) by using the Cost of Renewable Energy Spreadsheet Tool (CREST). Furthermore, this paper estimates the Average/Median/High output power (kWh) annually for the scenario among three areas in Kentucky, Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough. In this theoretical scenario, an average 2.27 TWh would be generated annually which exceeds the national generation percentage average. Furthermore, by the sixth year, the cumulative cash flow would exceed the breakeven point, proving the feasibility of these solar farms. The annual average power generation estimates for the areas of Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough are 0.3741 TWh, 1.1628 TWh, and 0.731 TWh respectively. The average profit per MWh estimates for the areas of Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough are $11,130.12/MWh, $10,742.46/MWh, and $11,392.01/MWh respectively. According to CREST, the final cumulative cash flow, after the 25-year life span of the panels, would be approximately $624,566,720.","PeriodicalId":43869,"journal":{"name":"Solar-Terrestrial Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar-Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/solar2040028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States is experiencing a large growth in the solar sector. The U.S. solar power capacity has grown from 0.34 Gigawatts (GW) in 2008 to an estimated 97.2 GW today. However, some states have had difficulty installing large scale solar farms due to concerns regarding geographic location, political climate, or economic factors. Kentucky (KY) is one of the states which is below the national average for solar energy production. However, KY contains a wealth of potential for these types of farms with decent solar irradiation levels and large tracts of unused land for solar farms. For the study, this paper selects three representative areas of KY by using PVWatts and topographical maps which can theoretically produce enough electricity so that KY can meet or exceed the national generation percentage average (2.3% or 2.06 TWh annually in KY’s case). The study analyzes the economic feasibility of solar photovoltaic systems (PV) farms in terms of Cumulative Cash Flow ($) and Payback Time (Year) by using the Cost of Renewable Energy Spreadsheet Tool (CREST). Furthermore, this paper estimates the Average/Median/High output power (kWh) annually for the scenario among three areas in Kentucky, Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough. In this theoretical scenario, an average 2.27 TWh would be generated annually which exceeds the national generation percentage average. Furthermore, by the sixth year, the cumulative cash flow would exceed the breakeven point, proving the feasibility of these solar farms. The annual average power generation estimates for the areas of Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough are 0.3741 TWh, 1.1628 TWh, and 0.731 TWh respectively. The average profit per MWh estimates for the areas of Smithland, Hickman, and Falls of Rough are $11,130.12/MWh, $10,742.46/MWh, and $11,392.01/MWh respectively. According to CREST, the final cumulative cash flow, after the 25-year life span of the panels, would be approximately $624,566,720.
美国太阳能投资:肯塔基州太阳能农场的可行性研究
美国正在经历太阳能行业的大幅增长。美国的太阳能发电能力已经从2008年的0.34吉瓦(GW)增长到今天估计的97.2吉瓦。然而,由于考虑到地理位置、政治气候或经济因素,一些州在安装大型太阳能发电场方面遇到了困难。肯塔基州是太阳能产量低于全国平均水平的州之一。然而,肯塔基州对这类农场具有丰富的潜力,具有良好的太阳辐照水平和大片未使用的土地可供太阳能农场使用。在研究中,本文通过使用PVWatts和地貌图选择了KY三个具有代表性的区域,理论上可以产生足够的电力,使KY达到或超过全国平均发电量百分比(KY为2.3%或2.06 TWh年)。本研究使用可再生能源成本电子表格工具(CREST),以累积现金流($)和投资回收期(年)来分析太阳能光伏系统(PV)农场的经济可行性。此外,本文估计了肯塔基州、史密斯兰、希克曼和拉夫瀑布三个地区每年的平均/中位数/高输出功率(千瓦时)。在这个理论情景中,每年平均将产生2.27太瓦时,超过全国发电百分比的平均水平。此外,到第六年,累积现金流将超过盈亏平衡点,证明这些太阳能农场的可行性。Smithland、Hickman和Falls of Rough地区的年平均发电量估计分别为0.3741 TWh、1.1628 TWh和0.731 TWh。Smithland、Hickman和Falls of Rough地区的平均每兆瓦时利润分别为11,130.12美元/兆瓦时、10,742.46美元/兆瓦时和11,392.01美元/兆瓦时。根据CREST的说法,在电池板25年的使用寿命之后,最终的累积现金流将约为624,566,720美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Solar-Terrestrial Physics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信