Viral life: Covid-19's destabilisation of our thinking

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Rachelle Adams, C. Soudien
{"title":"Viral life: Covid-19's destabilisation of our thinking","authors":"Rachelle Adams, C. Soudien","doi":"10.1353/trn.2020.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of life is and has been one of the most important and keenly contested questions of the modern era. What constitutes life? When does life begin? What is the essence of human life? What is the distinction, and how is this evidenced, between being alive and having life? And, whose life matters? These ideas were famously explored in Bruno Latour’s (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence where he lays out the dilemma that faced us. All we have to rely on in understanding the world in which we live and in defining ourselves against that which is not ‘us’, he suggested, was science. But, can we trust science: ‘[w]hen it is a matter of obtaining valid knowledge about objects as complex as whole systems of the Earth, knowledge that must lead to radical changes in the most intimate details of existence for billions of people, it is infinitely safer to rely on the institution of science than on indisputable certainty. But also infinitely riskier’ (2013:4). The risk lies in placing our trust and understanding of the world in institutions of knowledge that have historically","PeriodicalId":45045,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2020.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of life is and has been one of the most important and keenly contested questions of the modern era. What constitutes life? When does life begin? What is the essence of human life? What is the distinction, and how is this evidenced, between being alive and having life? And, whose life matters? These ideas were famously explored in Bruno Latour’s (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence where he lays out the dilemma that faced us. All we have to rely on in understanding the world in which we live and in defining ourselves against that which is not ‘us’, he suggested, was science. But, can we trust science: ‘[w]hen it is a matter of obtaining valid knowledge about objects as complex as whole systems of the Earth, knowledge that must lead to radical changes in the most intimate details of existence for billions of people, it is infinitely safer to rely on the institution of science than on indisputable certainty. But also infinitely riskier’ (2013:4). The risk lies in placing our trust and understanding of the world in institutions of knowledge that have historically
病毒生命:Covid-19颠覆了我们的思维
生命的问题一直是现代最重要、争论最激烈的问题之一。生命是由什么构成的?生命从何时开始?人类生命的本质是什么?活着和拥有生命之间的区别是什么,如何证明这一点?谁的生命重要?布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)在2013年出版的《对存在模式的探究》(An Inquiry into Modes of Existence)一书中对这些观点进行了著名的探讨,他在书中阐述了我们面临的困境。他认为,要理解我们所生活的世界,并根据非“我们”来定义自己,我们所依赖的就是科学。但是,我们能相信科学吗?“当我们要获得关于像地球整个系统这样复杂的物体的有效知识时,这些知识必然会导致数十亿人生活中最亲密的细节发生根本变化时,依靠科学机构比依靠无可争辩的确定性要安全得多。”但也有无限的风险”(2013:4)。风险在于将我们对世界的信任和理解置于历史上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信