Institutional foodservice benchmarking: survey of administrators' attitudes and practices in the USA

Saunya N. Bright, Junehee Kwon, Carolyn Bednar, Julia Newcomer
{"title":"Institutional foodservice benchmarking: survey of administrators' attitudes and practices in the USA","authors":"Saunya N. Bright,&nbsp;Junehee Kwon,&nbsp;Carolyn Bednar,&nbsp;Julia Newcomer","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Benchmarking is an ongoing process that gathers information to evaluate the best practices and improve performance. Despite possible changes and benefits, research reporting current foodservice benchmarking is limited. A nationwide survey of foodservice administrators was conducted to determine current practices and administrators' attitudes toward benchmarking. A questionnaire was developed, validated by experts and pilot-tested. Randomly selected, 600 foodservice administrators from health-care, school, correctional and university facilities received questionnaires, and 121 provided usable data (20%). Food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, and percent customer satisfaction with service were the three most used measures. Benchmarking was regarded as important in performing most respondents' jobs (61%), but fewer indicated their benchmarking knowledge as being above average (48%). For training, 41% indicated needs for training on ways to collaborate with benchmarking partners. The majority preferred training through professional association meetings (70%) and Internet-based training (69%). Results indicate opportunities for benchmarking training preferably through meetings and Internet.</p>","PeriodicalId":100783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foodservice","volume":"20 3","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foodservice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Benchmarking is an ongoing process that gathers information to evaluate the best practices and improve performance. Despite possible changes and benefits, research reporting current foodservice benchmarking is limited. A nationwide survey of foodservice administrators was conducted to determine current practices and administrators' attitudes toward benchmarking. A questionnaire was developed, validated by experts and pilot-tested. Randomly selected, 600 foodservice administrators from health-care, school, correctional and university facilities received questionnaires, and 121 provided usable data (20%). Food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, and percent customer satisfaction with service were the three most used measures. Benchmarking was regarded as important in performing most respondents' jobs (61%), but fewer indicated their benchmarking knowledge as being above average (48%). For training, 41% indicated needs for training on ways to collaborate with benchmarking partners. The majority preferred training through professional association meetings (70%) and Internet-based training (69%). Results indicate opportunities for benchmarking training preferably through meetings and Internet.

机构餐饮服务基准:美国管理人员的态度和做法的调查
基准测试是一个持续的过程,它收集信息以评估最佳实践并改进性能。尽管可能的变化和好处,研究报告目前的餐饮服务基准是有限的。一项全国范围内的餐饮服务管理人员调查被进行,以确定当前的做法和管理人员对基准的态度。制定了一份调查问卷,经专家验证并进行了试点测试。从卫生保健、学校、惩教所和大学机构随机抽取的600名餐饮服务管理人员收到了问卷,其中121人提供了可用数据(20%)。食品成本百分比、人工成本百分比和顾客服务满意度百分比是最常用的三个衡量标准。大多数受访者(61%)认为标杆管理对他们的工作很重要,但只有少数受访者表示他们的标杆管理知识高于平均水平(48%)。在培训方面,41%的受访者表示需要就如何与标杆合作伙伴进行合作进行培训。大多数人更喜欢通过专业协会会议(70%)和基于互联网的培训(69%)进行培训。结果表明,最好通过会议和互联网进行基准培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信