Cell separation: Potentials and pitfalls

Narges Rahmanian, M. Bozorgmehr, monire torabi, A. Akbari, A. Zarnani
{"title":"Cell separation: Potentials and pitfalls","authors":"Narges Rahmanian, M. Bozorgmehr, monire torabi, A. Akbari, A. Zarnani","doi":"10.1080/10826068.2016.1163579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cell separation techniques play an indispensable part in numerous basic biological studies and even clinical settings. Although various cell isolation methods with diverse applications have been devised so far, not all of them have been able to gain widespread popularity among researchers and clinicians. There is not a single method known to be advantageous over all cell isolation techniques, and in fact, it is the researcher’s aim in performing a study that determines the most suitable method. A perfect method for one study might not be necessarily a proper choice for another and likewise, expensive and complex isolation methods might not always be the best choices. There are several criteria such as cell purity, viability, activation status, and frequency that need to be given serious thought before selecting an isolation technique. Moreover, time and cost are two of the key elements that should be taken into consideration before implementing a project. Hence, here we provide a succinct description of six more popular cell separation methods with respect to their principles, advantages, and disadvantages as well as their most common applications. We further provide several key features of each technique so that it helps the researchers to take the first step toward opting for the best method that fits well into their projects.","PeriodicalId":20393,"journal":{"name":"Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2016.1163579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cell separation techniques play an indispensable part in numerous basic biological studies and even clinical settings. Although various cell isolation methods with diverse applications have been devised so far, not all of them have been able to gain widespread popularity among researchers and clinicians. There is not a single method known to be advantageous over all cell isolation techniques, and in fact, it is the researcher’s aim in performing a study that determines the most suitable method. A perfect method for one study might not be necessarily a proper choice for another and likewise, expensive and complex isolation methods might not always be the best choices. There are several criteria such as cell purity, viability, activation status, and frequency that need to be given serious thought before selecting an isolation technique. Moreover, time and cost are two of the key elements that should be taken into consideration before implementing a project. Hence, here we provide a succinct description of six more popular cell separation methods with respect to their principles, advantages, and disadvantages as well as their most common applications. We further provide several key features of each technique so that it helps the researchers to take the first step toward opting for the best method that fits well into their projects.
细胞分离:潜力和缺陷
细胞分离技术在许多基础生物学研究甚至临床环境中起着不可或缺的作用。尽管到目前为止已经设计出了各种不同用途的细胞分离方法,但并不是所有的方法都能在研究人员和临床医生中得到广泛的普及。没有一种已知的方法优于所有的细胞分离技术,事实上,研究人员进行研究的目的是确定最合适的方法。一项研究的完美方法可能不一定是另一项研究的正确选择,同样,昂贵而复杂的分离方法可能并不总是最佳选择。在选择分离技术之前,需要认真考虑几个标准,如细胞纯度、活力、激活状态和频率。此外,时间和成本是在实施项目之前应该考虑的两个关键因素。因此,在这里,我们提供了六种更流行的细胞分离方法的简要描述,包括它们的原理,优点和缺点,以及它们最常见的应用。我们进一步提供了每种技术的几个关键特性,以便帮助研究人员迈出选择适合其项目的最佳方法的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信