Let’s not forget the role of environmental psychology in our quest for healthier cities

Lindsay J. McCunn, Hannah Arnett
{"title":"Let’s not forget the role of environmental psychology in our quest for healthier cities","authors":"Lindsay J. McCunn, Hannah Arnett","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2022.2143254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every day, around the world, city dwellers experience the enticements, innovations, and complexities native to the urban form. Cities naturally afford a sense of vibrancy, social connection, cultural immersion, and community. They also serve as places for augmenting relationships and affiliations, accessing resources and technology, as well as economic gain. But, for many, cities are also rife with hardship and uncertainty, social injustice, and unsustainable systems – systems that benefit some while entrenching inequity for others. Arguably, governments, organizations, and individuals alike have needed to prioritize transdisciplinary knowledge about people-place relations for decades as they work to predict and improve resilience and public health. Urgent human and planetary health demands in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the midst of climate change, exist. This means that developing strategies for urban planners and practitioners to use as they facilitate change quickly is prudent. In response, our primary aim for this special issue of Cities & Health titled ‘Planning for People and Health: Environmental Psychology in the City’ is to communicate interdisciplinary research and commentary at the intersection of urban planning, social science, and public health. Creating (and then maintaining) opportunities for city inhabitants to foster their quality of life and wellbeing, while learning from different cultures and contexts, requires researchers, planners, and decisionmakers to have a clearer understanding of human psychological processes in relation to the built and natural settings that surround them. As a professional environmental psychologist, and a research practitioner specializing in place-based community wellbeing and health innovation, co-guest editing this special issue fulfilled our joint aspiration to bring together academic and field work that references theories found in environmental psychology – a discipline centred on studying transactions between people and place (Gifford 2014). Our overarching objective was to publish existing (and stimulate new) investigations about urban psychology, health, and sustainable behaviours from around the globe. The special issue succeeds in showcasing empirical, conceptual, and methodological contributions written for a broad audience. And, as with all issues of Cities & Health, many papers are accompanied by a ‘City Know How’ submission that allows authors to summarize the applied aspects of their work in a format that practitioners, planners, and academics can use quickly and easily, ‘on the ground’. The various types of papers, book reviews, and city shorts reveal an evolving evidence base that can be used to address a variety of challenges related to urban life. Generally, the contributions in this special issue employ mixed-methods research approaches to study how the quality of urban infrastructure can affect human wellbeing (e.g. studying apartment building defects in relation to mental health, Foster et al. 2022). The association between affect and exposure to high-rise buildings is also examined (Mazumder et al. 2020), as is the therapeutic value of blue space on psychological outcomes for urban residents (Satariano 2021). Research on nature place-making in the city, and some of the strategies that can improve evaluations of social connection and community wellbeing is also included (Sones et al. 2021, Benjumea et al. 2022, Lach et al. 2022). The extent to which the built environment can contribute to loneliness in cities (Jamalishahni et al. In press), how open outdoor areas positively relate to health (Ajayi and Amole 2022), and the impacts of urban walking on psychophysical wellbeing during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic are other topics explored in the special issue (Neale et al. 2022). Taken together, these works express the nuanced and complex nature of city settings, along with ideas about how preventative, healthfocused planning methods can be implemented so that the principles of environmental psychology can play a role in bolstering residents’ quality of life. Common themes among some of the papers in the issue is the value of social cohesion and forging a connection with nature for positive city living, and the effectiveness of environmental interventions on specific social determinants of health. Cultivating wellbeing and place-making are presented as mechanisms for fostering pro-environmental behaviour and","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":"1 1","pages":"1021 - 1023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2143254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every day, around the world, city dwellers experience the enticements, innovations, and complexities native to the urban form. Cities naturally afford a sense of vibrancy, social connection, cultural immersion, and community. They also serve as places for augmenting relationships and affiliations, accessing resources and technology, as well as economic gain. But, for many, cities are also rife with hardship and uncertainty, social injustice, and unsustainable systems – systems that benefit some while entrenching inequity for others. Arguably, governments, organizations, and individuals alike have needed to prioritize transdisciplinary knowledge about people-place relations for decades as they work to predict and improve resilience and public health. Urgent human and planetary health demands in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the midst of climate change, exist. This means that developing strategies for urban planners and practitioners to use as they facilitate change quickly is prudent. In response, our primary aim for this special issue of Cities & Health titled ‘Planning for People and Health: Environmental Psychology in the City’ is to communicate interdisciplinary research and commentary at the intersection of urban planning, social science, and public health. Creating (and then maintaining) opportunities for city inhabitants to foster their quality of life and wellbeing, while learning from different cultures and contexts, requires researchers, planners, and decisionmakers to have a clearer understanding of human psychological processes in relation to the built and natural settings that surround them. As a professional environmental psychologist, and a research practitioner specializing in place-based community wellbeing and health innovation, co-guest editing this special issue fulfilled our joint aspiration to bring together academic and field work that references theories found in environmental psychology – a discipline centred on studying transactions between people and place (Gifford 2014). Our overarching objective was to publish existing (and stimulate new) investigations about urban psychology, health, and sustainable behaviours from around the globe. The special issue succeeds in showcasing empirical, conceptual, and methodological contributions written for a broad audience. And, as with all issues of Cities & Health, many papers are accompanied by a ‘City Know How’ submission that allows authors to summarize the applied aspects of their work in a format that practitioners, planners, and academics can use quickly and easily, ‘on the ground’. The various types of papers, book reviews, and city shorts reveal an evolving evidence base that can be used to address a variety of challenges related to urban life. Generally, the contributions in this special issue employ mixed-methods research approaches to study how the quality of urban infrastructure can affect human wellbeing (e.g. studying apartment building defects in relation to mental health, Foster et al. 2022). The association between affect and exposure to high-rise buildings is also examined (Mazumder et al. 2020), as is the therapeutic value of blue space on psychological outcomes for urban residents (Satariano 2021). Research on nature place-making in the city, and some of the strategies that can improve evaluations of social connection and community wellbeing is also included (Sones et al. 2021, Benjumea et al. 2022, Lach et al. 2022). The extent to which the built environment can contribute to loneliness in cities (Jamalishahni et al. In press), how open outdoor areas positively relate to health (Ajayi and Amole 2022), and the impacts of urban walking on psychophysical wellbeing during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic are other topics explored in the special issue (Neale et al. 2022). Taken together, these works express the nuanced and complex nature of city settings, along with ideas about how preventative, healthfocused planning methods can be implemented so that the principles of environmental psychology can play a role in bolstering residents’ quality of life. Common themes among some of the papers in the issue is the value of social cohesion and forging a connection with nature for positive city living, and the effectiveness of environmental interventions on specific social determinants of health. Cultivating wellbeing and place-making are presented as mechanisms for fostering pro-environmental behaviour and
让我们不要忘记环境心理学在我们追求更健康城市中的作用
每天,世界各地的城市居民都在体验着城市形态的诱惑、创新和复杂性。城市自然提供了一种活力、社会联系、文化沉浸感和社区感。它们也是增强关系和隶属关系、获取资源和技术以及获得经济利益的场所。但是,对许多城市来说,城市也充斥着困难和不确定性、社会不公和不可持续的制度——这些制度使一些人受益,但却使另一些人陷入不平等。可以说,几十年来,政府、组织和个人在努力预测和改善复原力和公共卫生时,都需要优先考虑关于人与地关系的跨学科知识。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,在气候变化期间,存在着紧迫的人类和地球健康需求。这意味着为城市规划者和实践者制定战略以促进快速变化是谨慎的。作为回应,我们的《城市与健康》特刊《人与健康的规划:城市中的环境心理学》的主要目的是交流城市规划、社会科学和公共卫生交叉领域的跨学科研究和评论。为城市居民创造(然后维护)机会,提高他们的生活质量和福祉,同时从不同的文化和环境中学习,这需要研究人员、规划者和决策者更清楚地了解与周围建筑和自然环境相关的人类心理过程。作为一名专业的环境心理学家,以及一名专注于基于地点的社区福祉和健康创新的研究实践者,本期特刊的共同编辑实现了我们的共同愿望,即将参考环境心理学理论的学术和实地工作结合起来——环境心理学是一门以研究人与地点之间的交易为中心的学科(Gifford 2014)。我们的首要目标是发表现有的(并激发新的)关于全球城市心理学、健康和可持续行为的调查。这个特刊成功地展示了为广大读者写的经验、概念和方法方面的贡献。而且,与《城市与健康》的所有问题一样,许多论文都附有“城市知识”投稿,允许作者以一种格式总结其工作的应用方面,以便从业者、规划者和学者可以“在实地”快速、轻松地使用。各种类型的论文、书评和城市短片揭示了一个不断发展的证据基础,可用于解决与城市生活相关的各种挑战。一般来说,本期特刊的贡献采用混合方法研究方法来研究城市基础设施的质量如何影响人类福祉(例如,研究与心理健康有关的公寓楼缺陷,Foster et al. 2022)。还研究了情绪与高层建筑暴露之间的关系(Mazumder et al. 2020),以及蓝色空间对城市居民心理结果的治疗价值(Satariano 2021)。还包括对城市自然场所的研究,以及一些可以改善社会联系和社区福祉评估的策略(Sones等人,2021年,Benjumea等人,2022年,Lach等人,2022年)。建筑环境在多大程度上导致了城市中的孤独感(Jamalishahni et al.)。在新闻中),开放的户外区域如何与健康积极相关(Ajayi和Amole 2022),以及在COVID-19大流行早期,城市步行对心理生理健康的影响是特刊中探讨的其他主题(Neale等人,2022)。总而言之,这些作品表达了城市环境微妙而复杂的本质,以及如何实施以预防和健康为重点的规划方法,从而使环境心理学的原则能够在提高居民生活质量方面发挥作用。本期一些论文的共同主题是社会凝聚力的价值,以及为积极的城市生活建立与自然的联系,以及环境干预对健康的具体社会决定因素的有效性。培养幸福感和营造场所被认为是促进亲环境行为的机制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信