Evaluation of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) Incidence in Critically ill Patients

M. Pal, V. Pawar, D. Bharambe, U. Tewary, M. Setia
{"title":"Evaluation of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) Incidence in Critically ill Patients","authors":"M. Pal, V. Pawar, D. Bharambe, U. Tewary, M. Setia","doi":"10.5530/jppcm.2018.4.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We evaluated the instances of potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in critically ill patients in a private care center, Mumbai, India and studied the factors associated with these. Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of 107 individuals from an intensive care unit in Mumbai, India. We used Medscape’s multidrug interaction checker to identify and analyse the pattern of potential DDIs. We used the poison regression models for count outcomes to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, co-morbidities). Key findings: The total number of interactions was 433 [41.4% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI]: 37.6% - 45.6%)]. These interactions were highest in > 80 years (56.8%, 95% CI: 45.0% - 70.8%). About 28% (95% CI: 25.4% - 31.9%) interactions were classified as ‘significant’ and only 0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% - 0.5%) were classified as ‘contraindicated’ interactions. The interactions were significantly higher in individuals with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (Rate Ratio [RR]: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.41). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly less likely to have interactions affecting distribution (RR: 0.17, 95% 0.04, 0.77) and metabolism (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.65). Patients with renal disorders had significantly lower pharmacokinetic interactions (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.91). Conclusions: Though minor interactions were common, the proportion of contraindicated and serious interactions was low. Physicians, probably, were careful while prescribing medications to patients with DM, liver and renal diseases. However, this apparently was not the case in patients with CVDs. Thus, along with regular monitoring, it is important to train and advocate information about drug interactions with physicians of all specialties. Key words: Drug-drug interactions, Liver, Kidney, Cardio-vascular diseases.","PeriodicalId":16825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jppcm.2018.4.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the instances of potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in critically ill patients in a private care center, Mumbai, India and studied the factors associated with these. Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of 107 individuals from an intensive care unit in Mumbai, India. We used Medscape’s multidrug interaction checker to identify and analyse the pattern of potential DDIs. We used the poison regression models for count outcomes to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, co-morbidities). Key findings: The total number of interactions was 433 [41.4% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI]: 37.6% - 45.6%)]. These interactions were highest in > 80 years (56.8%, 95% CI: 45.0% - 70.8%). About 28% (95% CI: 25.4% - 31.9%) interactions were classified as ‘significant’ and only 0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% - 0.5%) were classified as ‘contraindicated’ interactions. The interactions were significantly higher in individuals with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (Rate Ratio [RR]: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.41). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly less likely to have interactions affecting distribution (RR: 0.17, 95% 0.04, 0.77) and metabolism (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.65). Patients with renal disorders had significantly lower pharmacokinetic interactions (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.91). Conclusions: Though minor interactions were common, the proportion of contraindicated and serious interactions was low. Physicians, probably, were careful while prescribing medications to patients with DM, liver and renal diseases. However, this apparently was not the case in patients with CVDs. Thus, along with regular monitoring, it is important to train and advocate information about drug interactions with physicians of all specialties. Key words: Drug-drug interactions, Liver, Kidney, Cardio-vascular diseases.
危重患者潜在药物相互作用(ddi)发生率的评价
目的:我们评估了印度孟买一家私人护理中心危重患者中潜在的药物-药物相互作用(ddi)的情况,并研究了与这些相互作用相关的因素。方法:这是对印度孟买重症监护病房107名患者的二次数据分析。我们使用Medscape的多药物相互作用检查器来识别和分析潜在的ddi模式。我们使用毒性回归模型对计数结果进行调整,以排除潜在的混杂因素(年龄、性别、合并症)。主要发现:总交互次数为433次[41.4%(95%置信区间[CI]: 37.6% - 45.6%)]。这些相互作用在> 80岁时最高(56.8%,95% CI: 45.0% - 70.8%)。约28% (95% CI: 25.4% - 31.9%)的相互作用被归类为“显著”,只有0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% - 0.5%)被归类为“禁忌症”相互作用。心血管疾病(cvd)患者的相互作用明显更高(比率比[RR]: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.41)。糖尿病(DM)患者发生相互作用影响分布(RR: 0.17, 95% 0.04, 0.77)和代谢(RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.65)的可能性显著降低。肾脏疾病患者的药代动力学相互作用显著降低(RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.91)。结论:虽然轻微相互作用很常见,但禁忌症和严重相互作用的比例较低。医生在给糖尿病、肝脏和肾脏疾病患者开药时可能很小心。然而,这显然不是心血管疾病患者的情况。因此,随着定期监测,重要的是培训和宣传有关药物相互作用的信息与所有专业的医生。关键词:药物相互作用,肝,肾,心血管疾病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信