Creating and Capturing Value in Repeated Exchange Relationships: The Second Paradox of Embeddedness

Daniel W. Elfenbein, Todd R. Zenger
{"title":"Creating and Capturing Value in Repeated Exchange Relationships: The Second Paradox of Embeddedness","authors":"Daniel W. Elfenbein, Todd R. Zenger","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior empirical studies suggest repeated exchange develops increasing value in buyer–supplier relationships. A first order implication of this finding is that buyers will concentrate exchange among a relatively small number of suppliers to generate maximum value in relationships. However, buyers are equally concerned with value capture. By distributing rather than concentrating exchange, buyers may position themselves to capture more of the value created, leaving buyers potentially conflicted concerning the choice. We label this dynamic the second paradox of embeddedness, distinguishing it from Uzzi’s [Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firmnetworks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.] paradox driven by technological uncertainty. By examining the procurement activities of a large, diversified manufacturing company, we then test for supplier and buyer behavior consistent with the conditions that give rise to the second paradox and behaviors that result from it.","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"32 1","pages":"894-914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Prior empirical studies suggest repeated exchange develops increasing value in buyer–supplier relationships. A first order implication of this finding is that buyers will concentrate exchange among a relatively small number of suppliers to generate maximum value in relationships. However, buyers are equally concerned with value capture. By distributing rather than concentrating exchange, buyers may position themselves to capture more of the value created, leaving buyers potentially conflicted concerning the choice. We label this dynamic the second paradox of embeddedness, distinguishing it from Uzzi’s [Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firmnetworks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.] paradox driven by technological uncertainty. By examining the procurement activities of a large, diversified manufacturing company, we then test for supplier and buyer behavior consistent with the conditions that give rise to the second paradox and behaviors that result from it.
在重复交换关系中创造和获取价值:嵌入性的第二个悖论
先前的实证研究表明,重复交换在买方-供应商关系中发展出越来越多的价值。这一发现的第一阶含义是,买家将集中在相对较少的供应商之间进行交换,以在关系中产生最大的价值。然而,买家同样关心价值获取。通过分配而不是集中交换,买家可能会让自己获得更多创造的价值,这让买家在选择上存在潜在的矛盾。我们将这种动态称为嵌入性的第二个悖论,将其与Uzzi [Uzzi B(1997)]的《企业间网络中的社会结构和竞争:嵌入性悖论》区分开来。管理。科学。夸脱。42(1):35 - 67。由技术不确定性驱动的悖论。通过考察一家大型多元化制造公司的采购活动,我们测试了供应商和买家的行为是否符合导致第二个悖论的条件和由此产生的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信