Head and neck squamous cell cancer – the role of computed tomography enhanced with perfusion imaging in tumour staging

IF 2.9 Q2 ONCOLOGY
A. Trojanowska, P. Trojanowski, A. Drop, J. Klatka
{"title":"Head and neck squamous cell cancer – the role of computed tomography enhanced with perfusion imaging in tumour staging","authors":"A. Trojanowska, P. Trojanowski, A. Drop, J. Klatka","doi":"10.5114/WO.2011.25657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ded value of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) images combined with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in staging of head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCC). Material and methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients with histologically proven squamous cell cancer of the head and neck and qualified for surgical treatment were prospectively evaluated in 2 groups: based on CECT multiplanar reformations (axial, coronal and sagittal), and separately, based on CTP images combined with CECT data. Tumour stage was assessed in each group separately, with special emphasis on T4 stage, and results were compared with histological findings. Five patients underwent endoscopic laser tumour resection, 11 underwent other tumour resection (glossectomy, pharyngectomy) and 31 patients underwent en-bloc resection of the hypopharynx and larynx, allowing detailed pathological evaluation of possible tumour infiltration into surrounding structures. Two experienced head and neck radiologists evaluated the images. Inter-observer agreement was tested with the modified κ test. The χ2 test was applied to compare the number of correctly staged tumours for the two methods and readers. Results: Inter-observer agreement was high (k = 0.88-0.90). Significant differences between the two groups were observed; with added CTP assessment more anatomical structures were rated positive for tumour infiltration and diagnostic accuracy of this method was significantly higher when compared to CECT images. Sole evaluation of CECT images in less advanced cases led to overestimation of the disease, since inflammation and slight oedema could not be differentiated from tumour. Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography multi-planar images enhanced with CTP images were proven to improve accuracy in head and neck cancer staging. The added value of CTP may help to avoid overestimation of the malignant process and at the same time may facilitate depiction all infiltrated structures.","PeriodicalId":49354,"journal":{"name":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/WO.2011.25657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ded value of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) images combined with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in staging of head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCC). Material and methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients with histologically proven squamous cell cancer of the head and neck and qualified for surgical treatment were prospectively evaluated in 2 groups: based on CECT multiplanar reformations (axial, coronal and sagittal), and separately, based on CTP images combined with CECT data. Tumour stage was assessed in each group separately, with special emphasis on T4 stage, and results were compared with histological findings. Five patients underwent endoscopic laser tumour resection, 11 underwent other tumour resection (glossectomy, pharyngectomy) and 31 patients underwent en-bloc resection of the hypopharynx and larynx, allowing detailed pathological evaluation of possible tumour infiltration into surrounding structures. Two experienced head and neck radiologists evaluated the images. Inter-observer agreement was tested with the modified κ test. The χ2 test was applied to compare the number of correctly staged tumours for the two methods and readers. Results: Inter-observer agreement was high (k = 0.88-0.90). Significant differences between the two groups were observed; with added CTP assessment more anatomical structures were rated positive for tumour infiltration and diagnostic accuracy of this method was significantly higher when compared to CECT images. Sole evaluation of CECT images in less advanced cases led to overestimation of the disease, since inflammation and slight oedema could not be differentiated from tumour. Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography multi-planar images enhanced with CTP images were proven to improve accuracy in head and neck cancer staging. The added value of CTP may help to avoid overestimation of the malignant process and at the same time may facilitate depiction all infiltrated structures.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌-计算机断层扫描增强灌注成像在肿瘤分期中的作用
ct灌注(CTP)与ct增强(CECT)在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)分期中的价值材料与方法:将连续47例经组织学证实适合手术治疗的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者分为两组进行前瞻性评价:一组基于CECT多平面重建(轴位、冠状位和矢状位),另一组基于CTP图像结合CECT数据。分别评估各组肿瘤分期,特别强调T4期,并将结果与组织学结果进行比较。5例患者行内镜激光肿瘤切除术,11例患者行其他肿瘤切除术(舌切除术、咽部切除术),31例患者行下咽和喉部整体切除术,对肿瘤可能浸润周围结构进行详细病理评估。两位经验丰富的头颈部放射科医生评估了这些图像。采用改进的κ检验检验观察者间一致性。采用χ2检验比较两种方法和阅读器正确分期肿瘤的数量。结果:观察者间一致性高(k = 0.88-0.90)。两组比较差异有统计学意义;增加CTP评估后,更多解剖结构被评为肿瘤浸润阳性,与CECT图像相比,该方法的诊断准确性显着提高。由于炎症和轻微水肿不能与肿瘤区分开来,在不太晚期的病例中,单独评估CECT图像会导致对疾病的高估。结论:对比增强计算机断层扫描多平面图像与CTP图像增强可提高头颈癌分期的准确性。CTP的附加价值有助于避免对恶性过程的高估,同时有助于对所有浸润结构的描绘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Oncology is a journal aimed at oncologists, oncological surgeons, hematologists, radiologists, pathologists, radiotherapists, palliative care specialists, psychologists, nutritionists, and representatives of any other professions, whose interests are related to cancer. Manuscripts devoted to basic research in the field of oncology are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信