Implications of Russia’s War in Ukraine for the Global Agri-Food Sector – An Ex-Ante Assessment using Different Simulation Models

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Marvin Berndt, Kirsten Boysen-Urban, Simon Ehjeij, Amelia Espey, A. Feuerbacher, Dorothee Flaig, T. Heimann, S. Hess, M. Kempen, F. Schünemann, C. Wieck
{"title":"Implications of Russia’s War in Ukraine for the Global Agri-Food Sector – An Ex-Ante Assessment using Different Simulation Models","authors":"Marvin Berndt, Kirsten Boysen-Urban, Simon Ehjeij, Amelia Espey, A. Feuerbacher, Dorothee Flaig, T. Heimann, S. Hess, M. Kempen, F. Schünemann, C. Wieck","doi":"10.30430/gjae.2022.0310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of Russia’s war in Ukraine, three widely used trade and sector models were applied to assess: i) global food and nutrition security, ii) the effects on the bioeconomy, and iii) the implications for the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Simulation results show that an export stop of agri-food commodities in Ukraine and Russia results in a substantial increase in global agri-food prices under short-term assumptions. However, the longer-term effects are much smaller due to global supply responses. The effects on food security depend on the importance of cereals in countries’ diets. Furthermore, due to subsequent Gross Domestic Product declines, there may be further negative long-term implications for food security, especially in Africa. An additional scenario with a 10% increase in the global oil price shows that European Union (EU) biofuel production is heavily affected. The implementation of the initially envisaged CAP requirement of a set-aside of 4% of the farmed area would have little effect on EU cereal production, whereas a 10% reduction in fertiliser availability in the EU would lead to a decline in net production of cereals. A joint reduction in pig herd size and pork consumption could partly mitigate the negative consequences of reduced fertiliser availability, otherwise leakage would occur either through the import of pork into the EU for consumption or the production of EU pork meat for export markets. To mitigate the market effects of the war, EU policymakers should: i) encourage efficient (animal) nutrient use to offset fertiliser shortages and land use choices that increase market availability of food crops, ii) encourage restructuring of animal production in line with consumption developments to prevent leakage effects and ensure that non-food products are used efficiently as feed products, and iii) support vulnerable households to secure short-term food access.","PeriodicalId":48919,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30430/gjae.2022.0310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In light of Russia’s war in Ukraine, three widely used trade and sector models were applied to assess: i) global food and nutrition security, ii) the effects on the bioeconomy, and iii) the implications for the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Simulation results show that an export stop of agri-food commodities in Ukraine and Russia results in a substantial increase in global agri-food prices under short-term assumptions. However, the longer-term effects are much smaller due to global supply responses. The effects on food security depend on the importance of cereals in countries’ diets. Furthermore, due to subsequent Gross Domestic Product declines, there may be further negative long-term implications for food security, especially in Africa. An additional scenario with a 10% increase in the global oil price shows that European Union (EU) biofuel production is heavily affected. The implementation of the initially envisaged CAP requirement of a set-aside of 4% of the farmed area would have little effect on EU cereal production, whereas a 10% reduction in fertiliser availability in the EU would lead to a decline in net production of cereals. A joint reduction in pig herd size and pork consumption could partly mitigate the negative consequences of reduced fertiliser availability, otherwise leakage would occur either through the import of pork into the EU for consumption or the production of EU pork meat for export markets. To mitigate the market effects of the war, EU policymakers should: i) encourage efficient (animal) nutrient use to offset fertiliser shortages and land use choices that increase market availability of food crops, ii) encourage restructuring of animal production in line with consumption developments to prevent leakage effects and ensure that non-food products are used efficiently as feed products, and iii) support vulnerable households to secure short-term food access.
俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争对全球农业食品部门的影响-使用不同模拟模型的事前评估
鉴于俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争,应用了三种广泛使用的贸易和部门模型来评估:i)全球粮食和营养安全,ii)对生物经济的影响,以及iii)对欧洲共同农业政策(CAP)的影响。模拟结果表明,在短期假设下,乌克兰和俄罗斯农产品出口停止导致全球农产品价格大幅上涨。然而,由于全球供应的反应,长期影响要小得多。对粮食安全的影响取决于谷物在各国饮食中的重要性。此外,由于随后的国内生产总值下降,可能会对粮食安全产生进一步的长期负面影响,特别是在非洲。另外,如果全球油价上涨10%,欧盟的生物燃料生产将受到严重影响。实施最初设想的CAP要求,即预留4%的耕地面积,对欧盟谷物生产几乎没有影响,而欧盟肥料供应减少10%将导致谷物净产量下降。联合减少猪群规模和猪肉消费量可以在一定程度上减轻化肥供应减少的负面影响,否则将通过将猪肉进口到欧盟消费或欧盟猪肉生产用于出口市场而发生泄漏。为了减轻战争对市场的影响,欧盟政策制定者应该:1)鼓励有效的(动物)养分使用,以抵消肥料短缺和土地使用选择,从而增加粮食作物的市场可用性;2)鼓励根据消费发展调整动物生产,以防止泄漏效应,并确保非食品产品被有效地用作饲料产品;3)支持脆弱家庭确保短期食物获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
German Journal of Agricultural Economics
German Journal of Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The GJAE publishes a broad range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles. It aims for a balanced coverage of economic issues within agricultural and food production, demand and trade, rural development, and sustainable and efficient resource use as well as specific German or European issues. The GJAE also welcomes review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信