Evolving Praxis in Design Management: The transdisciplinary trajectory

Christine Z Miller, Sanika Palsikar, Jenessa Mae Spears
{"title":"Evolving Praxis in Design Management: The transdisciplinary trajectory","authors":"Christine Z Miller,&nbsp;Sanika Palsikar,&nbsp;Jenessa Mae Spears","doi":"10.1111/dmj.12081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Design has transitioned from its traditional object-focus to an orientation toward human-centered design. With this shift, the complexity of design processes, products, deliverables, and artifacts has advanced to acknowledge and honor their impact on human activities and systems across the planet. As design practice has evolved, designers have searched beyond their field for tools, theoretical frameworks, and approaches developed by practitioners from other disciplines that allow for a deeper understanding of the environments and networks in which human and non-human actors engage. Many designers, including design managers, have adopted anthropology's long-standing tradition of balancing systems-level, holistic research with place-based and deeply contextual inquiry. Over time numerous. sub-fields within design have emerged to address changing conditions, such as the increasingly strategic role of design within organizations. Design Management (DM) “encompasses the ongoing processes, business decisions, and strategies that enable innovation and create effectively-designed products, services, communications, environments, and brands that enhance our quality of life and provide organizational success” (Design Management Institute, 2022). Over time DM has embraced transdisciplinarity. It is a prime example and leader in this trend.</p><p>This paper examines the confluence of theory and methods across the disciplines, specifically Design and Anthropology. Both fields are continuously adapting to accelerating and unpredictable conditions in systems that span industry sectors, economies, socio-cultural groups, and physical and virtual geographies. It is not surprising there is an increasing confluence and, at the same time, tension and defensiveness in an effort to remain “pure”. However, individuals from both fields have found ways of mixing, integrating, experimenting, and evolving theory and new forms of practice. We will draw on specific, an original transdisciplinary project from practice that will elucidate this tension as well as emerging opportunities. We will argue the weaving of the two fields offers an opportunity to more intentionally put this knowledge into practice and uphold the shared ethical imperative to “do some good” while creating environments that sustain good work. The confluence of design and anthropology perspectives and methodologies and the emphasis on praxis, the practical application of theory in practice, enables practitioners to keep the social and ecological value of design at the center of their work. It is our hope and intention that this paper will inspire designers, educators, practitioners, and theorists to continue creative experimental collaboration in their own evolving practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design has transitioned from its traditional object-focus to an orientation toward human-centered design. With this shift, the complexity of design processes, products, deliverables, and artifacts has advanced to acknowledge and honor their impact on human activities and systems across the planet. As design practice has evolved, designers have searched beyond their field for tools, theoretical frameworks, and approaches developed by practitioners from other disciplines that allow for a deeper understanding of the environments and networks in which human and non-human actors engage. Many designers, including design managers, have adopted anthropology's long-standing tradition of balancing systems-level, holistic research with place-based and deeply contextual inquiry. Over time numerous. sub-fields within design have emerged to address changing conditions, such as the increasingly strategic role of design within organizations. Design Management (DM) “encompasses the ongoing processes, business decisions, and strategies that enable innovation and create effectively-designed products, services, communications, environments, and brands that enhance our quality of life and provide organizational success” (Design Management Institute, 2022). Over time DM has embraced transdisciplinarity. It is a prime example and leader in this trend.

This paper examines the confluence of theory and methods across the disciplines, specifically Design and Anthropology. Both fields are continuously adapting to accelerating and unpredictable conditions in systems that span industry sectors, economies, socio-cultural groups, and physical and virtual geographies. It is not surprising there is an increasing confluence and, at the same time, tension and defensiveness in an effort to remain “pure”. However, individuals from both fields have found ways of mixing, integrating, experimenting, and evolving theory and new forms of practice. We will draw on specific, an original transdisciplinary project from practice that will elucidate this tension as well as emerging opportunities. We will argue the weaving of the two fields offers an opportunity to more intentionally put this knowledge into practice and uphold the shared ethical imperative to “do some good” while creating environments that sustain good work. The confluence of design and anthropology perspectives and methodologies and the emphasis on praxis, the practical application of theory in practice, enables practitioners to keep the social and ecological value of design at the center of their work. It is our hope and intention that this paper will inspire designers, educators, practitioners, and theorists to continue creative experimental collaboration in their own evolving practice.

设计管理中不断发展的实践:跨学科轨迹
设计已经从传统的以对象为中心转向以人为中心的设计。随着这种转变,设计过程、产品、可交付成果和工件的复杂性已经提高到承认并尊重它们对整个地球上的人类活动和系统的影响。随着设计实践的发展,设计师们已经在他们的领域之外寻找工具、理论框架和方法,这些工具、理论框架和方法是由其他学科的从业者开发的,可以更深入地理解人类和非人类参与者参与的环境和网络。许多设计师,包括设计经理,都采用了人类学的长期传统,即平衡系统层面的整体研究与基于地点和深入情境的调查。久而久之数不胜数。设计中的子领域已经出现,以应对不断变化的条件,例如设计在组织中日益增长的战略作用。设计管理(DM)“包括持续的过程、商业决策和战略,这些过程、决策和战略使创新和创造有效设计的产品、服务、通信、环境和品牌,从而提高我们的生活质量并提供组织成功”(设计管理研究所,2022)。随着时间的推移,DM已经接受了跨学科。它是这一趋势的典范和领导者。本文考察了理论和方法在各个学科之间的融合,特别是设计和人类学。这两个领域都在不断适应跨行业、经济、社会文化群体以及物理和虚拟地理的系统中加速和不可预测的条件。毫不奇怪,在努力保持“纯洁”的过程中,人们越来越趋同,同时也越来越紧张和防御。然而,来自这两个领域的个人已经找到了混合、整合、实验和发展理论和新形式实践的方法。我们将从实践中借鉴一个具体的、原创的跨学科项目,来阐明这种紧张关系以及新兴的机会。我们认为,这两个领域的结合提供了一个机会,可以更有意地将这些知识付诸实践,并在创造维持良好工作的环境的同时,坚持“做好事”的共同道德要求。设计与人类学的观点和方法的融合以及对实践的强调,即理论在实践中的实际应用,使从业者能够将设计的社会和生态价值置于其工作的中心。这是我们的希望和意图,这篇论文将激励设计师,教育工作者,从业者和理论家继续创造性的实验合作,在自己的发展实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信