Resistant Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Effect of Adjuvant Systemic Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus Venous Intervention Alone.

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Amr M Elsharnoby, Ahmed H El-Barbary, Ali E Eldeeb, Hassan A Hassan
{"title":"Resistant Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Effect of Adjuvant Systemic Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus Venous Intervention Alone.","authors":"Amr M Elsharnoby, Ahmed H El-Barbary, Ali E Eldeeb, Hassan A Hassan","doi":"10.1177/15347346221100891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>The aim of this study</i> was to assess the adjuvant efficacy of adding systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to definitive venous intervention for healing of resistant chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs). From 97 chronic VLUs, 63 were subjected to a pre-study standard wound care. Thirty three ulcers failed to achieve 50% size reduction, after the 4-weeks standard care, and were allocated to be treated with: HBOT plus venous intervention (n = 17), or venous intervention alone (n = 16). Primary outcomes were the change in ulcer area, complete healing frequency and time, as well as ulcer recurrence. There was a history of recurrent ulcer (82.3% vs. 69%) in HBOT versus venous intervention groups, respectively. The comparison between both groups with regard to area change showed non-significant difference after 3 months of therapy, while there was a significant difference at 6 and 12 months. A significant positive correlation was found between the HBO sessions numbers (20-40) and the rate of ulcer size reduction. Ulcer complete closure after 3 months was observed in (41.7%) of HBOT group, versus (23%) in venous intervention group; (p = 0.33). After 12 months, complete closure was observed in (83.3%) of HBOT group, versus (53.8%) in venous intervention group; (p = 0.02). The mean time of complete closure was significantly shorter in HBOT group, (p = 0.001). HBOT may be effective as adjuvant to venous intervention in treatment of chronic resistant VLUs, it should be reserved for persistent ulcer. Randomized controlled trials with larger numbers is still needed to elucidate its exact role and specific indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"36 1","pages":"444-451"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346221100891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the adjuvant efficacy of adding systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to definitive venous intervention for healing of resistant chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs). From 97 chronic VLUs, 63 were subjected to a pre-study standard wound care. Thirty three ulcers failed to achieve 50% size reduction, after the 4-weeks standard care, and were allocated to be treated with: HBOT plus venous intervention (n = 17), or venous intervention alone (n = 16). Primary outcomes were the change in ulcer area, complete healing frequency and time, as well as ulcer recurrence. There was a history of recurrent ulcer (82.3% vs. 69%) in HBOT versus venous intervention groups, respectively. The comparison between both groups with regard to area change showed non-significant difference after 3 months of therapy, while there was a significant difference at 6 and 12 months. A significant positive correlation was found between the HBO sessions numbers (20-40) and the rate of ulcer size reduction. Ulcer complete closure after 3 months was observed in (41.7%) of HBOT group, versus (23%) in venous intervention group; (p = 0.33). After 12 months, complete closure was observed in (83.3%) of HBOT group, versus (53.8%) in venous intervention group; (p = 0.02). The mean time of complete closure was significantly shorter in HBOT group, (p = 0.001). HBOT may be effective as adjuvant to venous intervention in treatment of chronic resistant VLUs, it should be reserved for persistent ulcer. Randomized controlled trials with larger numbers is still needed to elucidate its exact role and specific indications.

难治性慢性静脉腿部溃疡:辅助性全身高压氧疗法与单独静脉介入治疗的效果。
本研究旨在评估在确定性静脉干预的基础上增加全身高压氧疗法(HBOT)对耐药慢性静脉腿部溃疡(VLU)愈合的辅助疗效。在 97 个慢性静脉性腿部溃疡中,63 个接受了研究前的标准伤口护理。经过 4 周的标准护理后,有 33 处溃疡的面积未能缩小 50%,这些溃疡被分配接受 HBOT 加静脉干预治疗:HBOT 加静脉干预(17 例)或单独静脉干预(16 例)。主要结果为溃疡面积变化、完全愈合频率和时间以及溃疡复发。HBOT 组和静脉干预组的溃疡复发率分别为 82.3% 和 69%。两组的面积变化比较显示,治疗 3 个月后差异不显著,而治疗 6 个月和 12 个月后差异显著。HBO 治疗次数(20-40 次)与溃疡面积缩小率之间存在明显的正相关。3 个月后,HBOT 组(41.7%)的溃疡完全闭合,而静脉干预组(23%)的溃疡完全闭合;(P = 0.33)。12 个月后,观察到 HBOT 组(83.3%)溃疡完全闭合,而静脉干预组(53.8%)溃疡完全闭合;(p = 0.02)。HBOT 组完全闭合的平均时间明显更短,(p = 0.001)。在治疗慢性耐药 VLU 时,HBOT 可作为静脉干预的辅助手段,但应仅限于顽固性溃疡。仍需进行更多的随机对照试验,以明确其确切作用和具体适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信