Purposive Reconstruction: A Reply to "A Computational and Evolutionary Perspective on the Role of Representation in Vision" by M. J. Tarr and M. J. Black

Christensen H.I., Madsen C.B.
{"title":"Purposive Reconstruction: A Reply to \"A Computational and Evolutionary Perspective on the Role of Representation in Vision\" by M. J. Tarr and M. J. Black","authors":"Christensen H.I.,&nbsp;Madsen C.B.","doi":"10.1006/ciun.1994.1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Tarr and Black′s paper it is stated that computer vision research should be based on reconstruction, as it offers the most promising framework for achieving insight into human visual cognition. It is further stated that it is in agreement with evolution. The competing school, the purposive, is considered too specific and relevant mainly for construction of robotic related systems with a limited functionality. In this paper it is argued that the two schools should not be viewed as competing, but rather as complementary. The reconstruction approach is used for research in vision functionalities, which may be combined into operational systems through a purposive analysis from a global point of view. Such a combined approach to vision is necessary for addressing critical issues such as continuous operation and achievement of specific visual tasks, while maintaining the generality needed to obtain insight into visual cognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100350,"journal":{"name":"CVGIP: Image Understanding","volume":"60 1","pages":"Pages 103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/ciun.1994.1039","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVGIP: Image Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049966084710394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In Tarr and Black′s paper it is stated that computer vision research should be based on reconstruction, as it offers the most promising framework for achieving insight into human visual cognition. It is further stated that it is in agreement with evolution. The competing school, the purposive, is considered too specific and relevant mainly for construction of robotic related systems with a limited functionality. In this paper it is argued that the two schools should not be viewed as competing, but rather as complementary. The reconstruction approach is used for research in vision functionalities, which may be combined into operational systems through a purposive analysis from a global point of view. Such a combined approach to vision is necessary for addressing critical issues such as continuous operation and achievement of specific visual tasks, while maintaining the generality needed to obtain insight into visual cognition.

目的重构:对“表征在视觉中的作用的计算和进化视角”的回复(m.j. Tarr和m.j. Black)
在Tarr和Black的论文中指出,计算机视觉研究应该基于重建,因为它为深入了解人类视觉认知提供了最有前途的框架。进一步说,它与进化论是一致的。竞争学校,目的,被认为过于具体和相关的主要是与有限的功能机器人相关系统的建设。本文认为,这两个学派不应被视为竞争,而应被视为互补。重建方法用于视觉功能的研究,通过从全局角度的有目的分析,可以将其结合到操作系统中。这种结合视觉的方法对于解决诸如连续操作和实现特定视觉任务等关键问题是必要的,同时保持对视觉认知的深入了解所需的一般性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信