Imaging and diagnostic accuracy of outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy

Y. Frolova, S. I. Yelgina
{"title":"Imaging and diagnostic accuracy of outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy","authors":"Y. Frolova, S. I. Yelgina","doi":"10.23946/2500-0764-2021-6-4-106-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To compare the results of visualisation and diagnostic accuracy during outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy in women with endometrial disease.Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with uterine diseases who underwent outpatient hysteroscopy at Kemerovo City Clinical Hospital №4 (n = 300) or inpatient hysteroscopy within the hospitals (n = 300) in Kemerovo from 2018 to 2020. Confirmation of endometrial disease was carried out by manual vacuum aspiration.Results. Indications, imaging, and diagnostic accuracy did not differ for most endometrial diseases in outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy, yet inpatient hysteroscopy was the option of choice in women with infertility (p = 0.035). Diagnostic accuracy of outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy was highly concordant, albeit outpatient hysteroscopy more often revealed adenomyosis and uterine malformation and less often identified endometrial polyps.Conclusion. Outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy are equally efficient, although outpatient hysteroscopy has its benefits in detecting adenomyosis and uterine malformation and be less informative in diagnosing endometrial polyps.","PeriodicalId":12493,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2021-6-4-106-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To compare the results of visualisation and diagnostic accuracy during outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy in women with endometrial disease.Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with uterine diseases who underwent outpatient hysteroscopy at Kemerovo City Clinical Hospital №4 (n = 300) or inpatient hysteroscopy within the hospitals (n = 300) in Kemerovo from 2018 to 2020. Confirmation of endometrial disease was carried out by manual vacuum aspiration.Results. Indications, imaging, and diagnostic accuracy did not differ for most endometrial diseases in outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy, yet inpatient hysteroscopy was the option of choice in women with infertility (p = 0.035). Diagnostic accuracy of outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy was highly concordant, albeit outpatient hysteroscopy more often revealed adenomyosis and uterine malformation and less often identified endometrial polyps.Conclusion. Outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy are equally efficient, although outpatient hysteroscopy has its benefits in detecting adenomyosis and uterine malformation and be less informative in diagnosing endometrial polyps.
门诊和住院宫腔镜的成像和诊断准确性
的目标。比较门诊和住院子宫内膜疾病患者宫腔镜的显像结果和诊断准确性。材料与方法。我们对2018年至2020年在克麦罗沃市第四临床医院(n = 300)或在克麦罗沃市医院(n = 300)接受门诊宫腔镜检查的子宫疾病患者进行了回顾性分析。子宫内膜疾病的诊断采用人工真空抽吸法。对于大多数子宫内膜疾病,门诊和住院宫腔镜检查的适应症、成像和诊断准确性没有差异,但住院宫腔镜是不孕妇女的首选(p = 0.035)。门诊和住院宫腔镜的诊断准确性高度一致,但门诊宫腔镜更多显示子宫腺肌症和子宫畸形,而较少发现子宫内膜息肉。门诊和住院宫腔镜同样有效,尽管门诊宫腔镜在检测子宫腺肌病和子宫畸形方面有其优势,但在诊断子宫内膜息肉方面信息较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信